1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
3 years ago
14

One theme of United States History is the tension between individual state governments and the national government. Trace the hi

story of this tension, starting with the writing of the Constitution and then adding at least three examples from American history where states and national governments were in conflict. Finally, why do you think the founders made this tension possible in the Constitution?
History
1 answer:
Andrew [12]3 years ago
8 0

This tension within the government of the United States can be traced back to the creation of the nation. At the beginning of its history, the United States was a collection of colonies, all of which were considered independent of each other. However, as the colonies gained independence, they decided to join in order to be stronger and ensure more protection. This led to a loose Confederation, which was the first instance of a United States.

An example of this was the writing of the Articles of Confederation. These articles were written by delegates from each of the colonies that had recently gained independence. The Articles are considered the first Constitution of the US, and they gave the federal government very little power, allowing states to have most of it. The passage of the Constitution reverted this to some extent, giving slightly more power to the federal government.

Another example of this tension occurred in the early 19th century. During this time period, each state was able to decide whether they would allow slavery within their borders, without much interference from the federal government. With the passage of the Missouri Compromise in 1820, half of the states of the country were slave states, while the other half were free states. This tension led to the Civil War.

Finally, prior to the Civil Rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s, segregation and Jim Crow laws were common in many states of the South. Many of these states refused to accept the authority of the federal government when these practices were outlawed.

The founders of the nation most likely made this possible for two reasons. First, they wanted to allow the original colonies to retain some of their original sovereignty. Second, they wanted to prevent the federal government from having too much power, as they believed that this could lead to a second monarchy or a dictatorship.

You might be interested in
What role did advertising play in transforming america into a consumer society?
Neko [114]
During and after WWI, America experienced rapid growth due to the fact that pretty much the rest of the western civilization was demolished. American businesses were selling to Europe, and obviously earned a lot of profit. There was a lot of opportunity, and people wanted to spend their extra money on fun things. Advertisers and Marketers capitalized on that, and started a shift into more consumeristic thinking. With the advent of electricity, tons of home appliances were created and marketed, emphasizing the "buy now and pay later" approach. With all of the kitchen appliances, the era of domesticity ended, and women were free to go do other things such as have jobs or pursue fun activities.
The economy thrived, money was created out of nothing (compound interest, etc), which lead to a bubble and eventual collapse in 1929.
Hope this helps! :)
6 0
3 years ago
What did the supporters of the Kansas and Nebraska act do
charle [14.2K]

The Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854  was an organic act that created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. It was drafted by Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas, passed by the 33rd United States Congress, and signed into law by President Franklin Pierce. Douglas introduced the bill with the goal of opening up new lands to development and facilitating construction of a transcontinental railroad, but the Kansas–Nebraska Act is most notable for effectively repealing the Missouri Compromise, stoking national tensions over slavery, and contributing to a series of armed conflicts known as "Bleeding Kansas".

The United States had acquired vast amounts of sparsely-settled land in the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, and since the 1840s Douglas had sought to establish a territorial government in a portion of the Louisiana Purchase that was still unorganized. Douglas's efforts were stymied by Senator David Rice Atchison and other Southern leaders who refused to allow the creation of territories that banned slavery; slavery would have been banned because the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery in territory north of latitude 36°30' north. To win the support of Southerners like Atchison, Pierce and Douglas agreed to back the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, with the status of slavery instead decided on the basis of "popular sovereignty." Under popular sovereignty, the citizens of each territory, rather than Congress, would determine whether or not slavery would be allowed.

8 0
3 years ago
1.) In exchange for allowing him to live, what did Sulla take away from Caesar?
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

Well, this is going to be a long answer! I hope I helped, please correct me if I'm wrong!

1. I believe he took Caesar's wife and Cinna’s daughter, in exchange of his life, since research showed that Young Julius Caesar was proscribed for no reason other than he refused to divorce his wife. (I'm not very sure about this)

2. He never married her because Rome, after all, did not recognize plural marriage, and at that time, Caesar was still married to Calpurnia.

3.  Caesar focused on economic changes, like improved land and waterways. His political reforms focused on creating physical structures, rebuilding cities and temples, and improving the Senate, The main ruling body in Rome. (I'm sorry about this one, I'm not very sure which one was most important)

4. The senators assassinated Caesar because they feared his unprecedented concentration of power during his dictatorship was undermining the Roman Republic, and presented the deed as an act of tyrannicide.

5. The death of Julius Caesar ultimately had the opposite impact of what his assassins hoped. Much of the Roman public hated the senators for the assassination, and a series of civil wars ensued.

4 0
3 years ago
Why were Americans encouraged by the outcome of the War of 1812?
OLga [1]

Answer:

C. They had won several battles.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Flying Tigers influence World War||?
Andreas93 [3]
Flying Tigers. The 1st American Volunteer Group (AVG) of the Chinese Air Force in 1941–1942, nicknamed the Flying Tigers, was composed of pilots from the United States Army Air Corps (USAAC), Navy (USN), and Marine Corps (USMC), recruited under presidential authority and commanded by Claire Lee Chennault.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In which battle did George Washington’s troops inflict heavy casualties on General Cornwallis’s troops?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HURRY I WILL MARK BRAINLIST
    13·2 answers
  • What did Lenin mean when he described the “transitional phase” of the Russian Revolution?
    13·2 answers
  • How do the mineral resources in North America compare with the rest of the world?
    15·1 answer
  • Tibetan Buddhists revere the ___________, a spiritual leader whose name means "Ocean of Wisdom." Kublai Khan Tao White Lotus Dal
    13·1 answer
  • How did Haiti successfully overthrow one of the world’s great empires?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement about the Stamp Act is most accurate?
    12·2 answers
  • 6) The truck groaned under the strain of its load
    9·2 answers
  • Grew on the
    8·2 answers
  • Which “class” did Mao Zedong claim would revolutionize China?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!