1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mariarad [96]
3 years ago
15

What are the constant of proportionality on these two?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Vadim26 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

k  =  y/x

as a fraction for both

You might be interested in
I need help with letters (D) and (E). My model equation from letter (C) is: P = -55/4 t+ 340.
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

(a) The two ordered pairs are (0 , 340) and (4 , 285)

(b) The slope is m = -55/4

The slope means the rate of decreases of the owl population was 55/4

per year (P decreased by 55/4 each year)

(c) The model equation is P = -55/4 t + 340

(d) The owl population in 2022 will be 216

(e)  At year 2038 will be no more owl in the park

Step-by-step explanation:

* Lets explain how to solve the problem

- The owl population in 2013 was measured to be 340

- In 2017 the owl population was measured again to be 285

- The owl population is P and the time is t where t measure the numbers

 of years since 2013

(a) Let t represented by the x-coordinates of the order pairs and P

   represented by the y-coordinates of the order pairs

∵ t is measured since 2013

∴ At 2013 ⇒ t = 0

∵ The population P in 2013 was 340

∴ The first order pair is (0 , 340)

∵ The time from 2013 to 2013 = 2017 - 2013 = 4 years

∴ At 2017 ⇒ t = 4

∵ The population at 2017 is 285

∴ The second order pair is (4 , 285)

* The two ordered pairs are (0 , 340) and (4 , 285)

(b) The slope of any lines whose endpoints are (x1 , y1) and (x2 , y2)

     is m=\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}

∵ (x1 , y1) is (0 , 340) and (x2 , y2) is (4 , 285)

∴ x1 = 0 , x2 = 4 and y1 = 340 , y2 = 285

∴ m = \frac{285-340}{4-0}=\frac{-55}{4}

* The slope is m = -55/4

∵ The slope is negative value

∴ The relation is decreasing

* The slope means the rate of decreases of the owl population was

  55/4 per year (<em>P decreased by 55/4 each year</em>)

(c) The linear equation form is y = mx + c, where m is the slope and c is

    the value of y when x = 0

∵ The population is P and represented by y

∵ The time is t and represented by t

∴ P = mt + c , c is the initial amount of population

∵ m = -55/4

∵ The initial amount of the population is 340

∴ P = -55/4 t + 340

* The model equation is P = -55/4 t + 340

(d) Lets calculate the time from 2013 to 2022

∵ t = 2022 - 2013 = 9 years

∵ P = -55/4 t + 340

∴ P = -55/4 (9) + 340 = 216.25 ≅ 216

* The owl population in 2022 will be 216

(e) If the model is accurate , then the owl population be be zero after

    t years

∵ P = -55/4 t + 340

∵ P = 0

∴ 0 = -55/4 t + 340

- Add 55/4 t to both sides

∴ 55/4 t = 340

- Multiply both sides by 4

∴ 55 t = 1360

- Divide both sides by 55

∴ t = 24.7 ≅ 25 years

- To find the year add 25 years to 2013

∵ 2013 + 25 = 2038

* At year 2038 will be no more owl in the park

8 0
3 years ago
The input value 2.
Irina18 [472]
Your answer is 9.

Since you have

2(2)^2 you get 2(4) which is 8.

Then you have -3(2) which is -6.

Lastly you have the 7.

When you add it up you get.

9
5 0
3 years ago
Subtract.
faltersainse [42]
18 1/2 -17 3/4
= 18.50 -17.75
= 0.75
= 3/4

The 4th selection is appropriate.
5 0
3 years ago
Find the surface area of the composite figure
Maslowich

Answer:

498

Step-by-step explanation:

For the blue block: 4(7x2) + 2(2x2) = 56 + 8 = 64

For green block: 4(12x7) + 2(7x7) = 336 +98 = 434

434 + 64 = 498

3 0
3 years ago
Angie and Becky each completed a separate proof to show that the measures of vertical angles AKG and HKB are equal. Who complete
Helga [31]

Answer:

Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."

Step-by-step explanation:

Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.

Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.

However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".

The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.

Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Posting a screenshot my loves
    14·1 answer
  • 2) If Jenny wants to make 80 cups of punch, how many cups of each ingredient will she<br> need?
    9·1 answer
  • Tiffany answered 80% of the questions on her math test correctly. There were 40 questions. How many questions did Tiffany get co
    5·1 answer
  • Please help!!! asap! ( 10 points)
    14·1 answer
  • Chloe is sorting items at a thrift store. She finds a box if tiny blocks that has 1,344 written on the outside. she can see that
    12·1 answer
  • What is the quotient?<br><br> StartFraction 5 Superscript negative 6 Over 5 cubed EndFraction
    7·1 answer
  • Easy points!!!
    9·1 answer
  • An item is purchased for a wholesale price of $48 and will be sold at a 55 percent markup. Which expression should be used to fi
    11·2 answers
  • Why is it important to avoid a smaller sample size?
    9·2 answers
  • With out calculation the answer, is 1/3 x 7/15 greater or less than 1/3?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!