I need help with the equation!
2 answers:
Yo faith!
Question 3: Use the equation y= mx + b where m equals slope or the rate of change and b equals the y-intercept.
We already have b, which is 100. The reason why it's 100 is because the y-intercept is where the line crosses directly over the y-intercept. To do so, the x-value must be 0.
Thus y = mx + 100
The slope/ROC can easily be said to be -10 as the x value changes by adding 1 and the y value changes by subtracting 10. However, let's just presume that we didn't know this and couldn't use mental math.
To calculate the slope, we'll use the formula
Take two points and insert them. I've chosen them for you:
1. (1,90)
2. (2,80)
⇒
⇒ -10
Therefore your equation, Faith, is y = -10x + 100
Question 1 of C:
Graph - If the ordered-pair points formulate a straight line.
Table - Constant rate of change/slope for the x and y values.
Equation - No exponents are present.
Question 2 of C: Not sure what ''previous problems'' are given that they are not supplied.
Question 3: Use the equation y= mx + b where m equals slope or the rate of change and b equals the y-intercept.
We already have b, which is 100. The reason why it's 100 is because the y-intercept is where the line crosses directly over the y-intercept. To do so, the x-value must be 0.
Thus y = mx + 100
The slope/ROC can easily be said to be -10 as the x value changes by adding 1 and the y value changes by subtracting 10. However, let's just presume that we didn't know this and couldn't use mental math.
To calculate the slope, we'll use the formula
1. (1,90)
2. (2,80)
Therefore your equation, Faith, is y = -10x + 100
Question 1 of C:
Graph - If the ordered-pair points formulate a straight line.
Table - Constant rate of change/slope for the x and y values.
Equation - No exponents are present.
Question 2 of C: Not sure what ''previous problems'' are given that they are not supplied.
You might be interested in
Answers:
Blank 1 = p and q
Blank 2 = Consecutive interior angles converse
=================================================
Explanation:
There's a lot of visual noise here, meaning there's a lot of lines and angles to potentially distract. I recommend redrawing things but only drawing lines p and q, and the transversal cut line t. Furthermore, I would mark only angle 8 and angle 13. See the diagram below.
The diagram is optional, but hopefully you can see that the angles are same side interior angles, aka consecutive interior angles. That's why we go with the consecutive interior angles converse
If we drop the "converse" portion, then that theorem says parallel lines lead to supplementary consecutive interior angles. The converse just reverses the flow of the logic.
