it would be against chris because he cooked the food (is the owner aswell) because dan did't know that the food was contaminated.
Explanation:
Answer:
Stare decisis
Explanation:
Stare decisis is a Latin terminology meaning standing by that which is has been decided.
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that mandates the courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis makes sure that cases with similar scenarios and facts are approached in the same way. Courts must follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.
Answer:
A national registration voter act requires states to use a shared "federal voter" form to register voters for all voters in that and every other state. This form will be made by the federal government instead of the state.
If Pamela appeals the case in order to include the witness who saw Darin driving, it is possible that the appeals court will not take the witness's testimony into account.
<h3>What happens if Pamela appeals?</h3>
Appeals courts are not there to retry a case or to give the case a new trial. Their purpose is to check if there were errors in the way the lower court handled the case.
This means that they often do not take new witness testimony into account. What this means for Pamela is that even though she has a new witness, the appeals court might not consider the testimony of the witness because they were not used in the first court.
Find out more on the appeals process at brainly.com/question/1897528
#SPJ1