The correlation between height and weight for a certain breed of plant is found to be 0.75. What percentage of the variability i n plant weight is NOT explained by height? 1-0.75 = 0.25 or 25% (b) 1-(.75)^2 = 0.5625 or 56.25% (c) 1-(.75)^2 = 0.4375 or 43.75% (d) (1 - 0.75)^2 = 0.0625 or 6.25%
1 answer:
Answer:
The percentage of the variability in plant weight is NOT explained by height is
%
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The correlation between height and weight is
Generally the R-Squared between height and weight is mathematically represented as
substituting values
This R-Squared tells us the percentage of plant weight is accounted by height
and from the calculation we see that it is 56.3%
Now the percentage of plant weight that is not accounted by height is
%
You might be interested in
Answer:
4/3
Step-by-step explanation:
To the power of negative one just means 1 divided by and 1 divided by 3/4 is just 4/3
Answer:
11.28m
Step-by-step explanation:
The computation of the height of the spire is shown below:
let us assume the height of the spire be x
Now
For triangle ABD
Tan 43 degrees = h ÷ x
x = h × cot 43 degrees
= 1.07236 h
For triangle ABC
tan 15 degrees = h ÷ (30 + x)
0.2679 = h ÷ 30 + 1.07236h
8.038 + 0.28728 h = h
h = 11.28m
Step-by-step explanation:
Equation of a line is y = mx + c
where
m is the slope
c is the y intercept
From the question the equation is
y = 4x − 11
Comparing with the general equation above
<h3>Slope = 4</h3><h3>y - intercept = - 11 or ( 0 , - 11)</h3>
Hope this helps you
Answer:
correct answer is 10
Step-by-step explanation:
a1 = 10 correct
a2 = 10+10 = 20
a3 =20+10 = 30..
Answer:
start at -2 then go right
Step-by-step explanation:
then leave a arrow mark me brainiest.