If the roots to such a polynomial are 2 and

, then we can write it as

courtesy of the fundamental theorem of algebra. Now expanding yields

which would be the correct answer, but clearly this option is not listed. Which is silly, because none of the offered solutions are *the* polynomial of lowest degree and leading coefficient 1.
So this makes me think you're expected to increase the multiplicity of one of the given roots, or you're expected to pull another root out of thin air. Judging by the choices, I think it's the latter, and that you're somehow supposed to know to use

as a root. In this case, that would make our polynomial

so that the answer is (probably) the third choice.
Whoever originally wrote this question should reevaluate their word choice...
Your answer would be x =211
Answer:
Using proportions, the pizza parlor should expect 20 breadsticks and 25 calzone orders if there were 100 total orders.
Step-by-step explanation:
Orders:
Salads 3
Pizzas 8
Sides of breadsticks 4
Pepperoni calzones 5
Total orders: 20
Proportion of sides breadsticks=4/20=0.2
Proportion of pepperoni calzones=5/20=0.25
For 100 total orders:
Sides of breadsticks=0.2(100)=20
Pepperoni calzones=0.25(100)=25
Answer:
no it is not
Step-by-step explanation:
3x+9y=1 simplified is
9y=-3x+1
y=-1/3x+1/9
this is the exact same equation as 3x+9y=1, so you cannot find another line thats parallel to it and passes through that same point (it'll always be that point)