Answer:
b. Very often, a company's stock price will rise when it announces that it plans to commence a share repurchase program. Such an announcement could lead to a stock price decline, but this does not normally happen.
Explanation:
Companies issue shares when they are seeking for more funds to run their business. Shares issued become part of the owner equity of the company given out.
When the company wants to reduce its outstanding shares it buys back its shares (repurchase).
When repurchase happens price goes up as this indicates the company is doing well and is not in need of extra funds to run its operations.
The confidence boost increases price.
It is rare for such announcement to cause a fall in share price, unless some negative information of the companie's performance is available.
Answer: <u><em>$3,600,000 is the amount Wood should capitalize as the cost of acquiring Pine's net assets.</em></u>
Given:
Wood Corp. issued 100,000 shares of its $20 par value
The market value of Wood's common stock on August 31 was $36 per share.
Wood paid a fee of $160,000 to the consultant who arranged this acquisition.
Costs of registering and issuing the equity securities amounted to $80,000.
∴ Cost of acquiring = 100,000 shares issued × $36 per share
= $3,60,000
Answer:
overall effect for the first year will be an increase of 94 millions in the cash flow.
Explanation:
The chip will provide:
27 million x $ (14 - 10) each = 104 millions of gross profit
But, decreases gross profit from older chip at rate of:
2 million x $ (11 - 6) each = 10 millions per year
The Chip will generate 104 gross profit but reduce other chip division profit by 10 million
<u>overall effect for the first year will be of 94 millions postive</u>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "<span>c.Frictional, seasonal, and structural unemployment " </span>most likely still occur when the economy has achieved full employment is that <span>c.Frictional, seasonal, and structural unemployment </span>
Answer:
Case summary:
D is a college alum gets trapped in a blizzard on his way home. He was furnished with nourishment and haven by an old couple and he returned home once the climate was clear. D's dad F guaranteed the couple to pay $500 recorded as a hard copy for their assistance and the couple acknowledged. In any case, as D and F had contrasts later, F denied paying that sum.
Case investigation:
Thought: Consideration is the advantage or worth got by the gathering for satisfaction of their guarantee. On the off chance that there is no thought, the agreement isn't enforceable. Following are the components of thought:
-
Lawfully adequate worth: The thought ought to have some an incentive under the lawful arrangements.
-
Dealt trade: The thought ought to give the chance to deal between the gatherings. It implies one gathering should return something of significant worth to the next gathering for execution of that party.
For instance, an individual A guarantees B that he would pay $1,000 for driving him to chip away at that day. Here. An is paying $1,000 for B as an arrival for driving him to work (execution).
A guarantees him to give him a vehicle as he was graduated. It isn't thought since B didn't vow to perform anything. It is only a present for B from A.
Past Consideration: The guarantees which were made by a gathering for the presentation of activities in past by another gathering are unenforceable. As there is no anticipated trade component, it is no thought.
Right now, old couple gave haven to D. They neither guarantee D to give cover nor bartered that he ought to give them something to return.
F guaranteed them to pay $500 as a demonstration of thankfulness for their assistance yet it is a present for their assistance in past. In this way, it isn't past thought.
Consequently, the couple can't hold F at risk for making the installment for giving haven to his child.
