Answer:
120 per year if im not wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
1% of 3000 is 30
30x4= 120
its 30x whatever percentage its at because 3000/100= 30
Answer:
D) The manager should fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not enough evidence to conclude that the number of unique daily listeners has changed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The scenario indicates the null hypotheses and alternative hypotheses are
Null hypotheses: The number of unique daily listeners hasn't changed.
Alternative hypotheses: The number of unique daily listeners has changed.
The null hypothesis is rejected if the calculated p-value is less significance level.
We are given that p-value is 0.0743 and confidence level=0.95.
Significance level =α=1-0.95=0.05.
As we can see the p-value is greater than significance level, so, we fail to reject the null hypotheses at 5% significance level.
Thus, we conclude at the 95% confidence level that the manager should fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not enough evidence to conclude that the number of unique daily listeners has changed
Answer:
Aight.
Rational, Real, Integer, Negative
The inequality that shows the maximum number of dresses she can buy is $7.15p+$9.95=$60 the maximum # of dresses she can buy is 7