Answer:
it's the number of "human rights violations"
Explanation:
I hope this helps
Answer:
The Supreme Court's opinion in the Brown v. Board of Education case of 1954 legally ended decades of racial segregation in America's public schools. Originally named after Oliver Brown, the first of many plaintiffs listed in the lower court case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS, the landmark decision actually resolved six separate segregation cases from four states, consolidated under the name Brown v. Board of Education. While the attorneys originally argued the cases on appeal to the Court in 1952, the featured document, School Segregation Cases - Order of Argument, offers a window into the three days in December of 1953 during which the attorneys reargued the cases.
A reargument was necessary because the Court desired briefs from both sides that would answer five questions, all having to do with the attorneys' opinions on whether or not Congress had segregation in public schools in mind when the 14th amendment was ratified. The document lists the names of each case, the states from which they came, the order in which the Court heard them, the names of the attorneys for the appellants and appellees, the total time allotted for arguments, and the dates over which the arguments took place.
The first case listed, Briggs v. Elliott, originated in Clarendon County, South Carolina, in the fall of 1950. Harry Briggs was one of twenty plaintiffs who were charging that R.W. Elliott, as president of the Clarendon County School Board, violated their right to equal protection under the fourteenth amendment by upholding the county's segregated education law. Briggs featured social science testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs from some of the nation's leading child psychologists, such as Dr. Kenneth Clark, whose famous doll study concluded that segregation negatively affected the self-esteem and psyche of African-American children. Such testimony was groundbreaking because on only one other occasion in U.S. history had a plaintiff attempted to present such evidence before the Court.
Explanation:
Incomplete question. Attached is the missing image.
<u>Explanation:</u>
1. The shows a <u>weak</u> prisoner forced to make a statement against his will, he is been forced to say what the man (representing the dictator, Hitler) behind him tells him to say.
2. Many people conclude that the fact Hitler had absolute authority in Nazi Germany makes him personally responsible for the way in which German minorities were treated.
3. Because failing to do so as is often the case would result in their own death, just as the cartoon shows a gun pointed at the head of the prisoner.
4. So he appears to be their messiah or savior.
Answer:
The types of damages that would be needed in order for them to be equally happy as they were before the garage fiasco are:
a) Compensatory damages
b) Consequential damages
Explanation:
a) Compensatory Damages are claims paid to directly to compensate the non-breaching party for the value of what was damaged, not done, or performed. For this purpose, compensatory damages will be equal to the cost of getting the garages fixed.
b) Consequential Damages address the costs incurred by the non-breaching party as a result of damages done to other facilities. Example, the sliding off of the garage could have led to flood water damaging some other property, which were not the direct subject of the claim.
A indictment( this is issued Iff there is probable cause that a crime was committed)
