1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following would ONLY

Law
2 answers:
ruslelena [56]3 years ago
8 0
I think the answer is a but if not it is c
BlackZzzverrR [31]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is the anti federalists. They didn’t support until the bill of rights was included so their rights were ensured. The federalists were the opposites.
You might be interested in
The most crucial component to the success of the HTS IS
aalyn [17]

Answer:

True/cooperative drivers would likely be the most correct one, if that's what you're asking.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
A man’s wife had an incurable and very painful disease. To put her out of her misery, he killed her.
Burka [1]
Answer: yes

explanation: if she was in so much pain, then she could’ve killed herself instead. Since it didn’t state if the man asked for her permission to kill her, then it was probably his choice
3 0
3 years ago
Why would the U.S. government continue having diplomatic relations with a country that shelters terrorists?
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

d?

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How did the supreme court ruling in 1954 impact segregation in america?
viktelen [127]

Answer:

Board of Education of Topeka, case in which, on May 17, 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9–0) that racial segregation in public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits the states from denying equal protection of the laws to any person within their jurisdictions.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions
zysi [14]

When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to Judicial Restraint.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The judicial branch is conferred with the power of interpretation of the law. Many times while exercising the power of judicial activism there is always a chance that justices may exceed their power. Hence, the theory of judicial restraint was evolved.

By judicial restraint, judges are encouraged to exercise their power with certain limits and to respect and follow stare decisis. This ensures that judges are not intruding into the realm of the legislature by involving themselves in law making.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how a case gets from trial court to the supreme court.
    15·1 answer
  • List one type of case that federal courts have jurisdiction over?
    13·1 answer
  • Jordan files for bankruptcy because he has debts of $1 million that he cannot pay. He would like to sign a document to assure hi
    8·2 answers
  • Vehicle skids are most likely to be caused by
    8·2 answers
  • The system on some vehicles adjust order to create better balance while driving at high speed?
    6·1 answer
  • How do other branches of the American government limit the power that the Supreme Court has?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following courts would not include a jury? Select all that apply.
    10·1 answer
  • ¿El cumplimiento de mis derechos y deberes depende de m ? ¿Porqe?
    15·1 answer
  • What trails of accelerant use to carry a fire from one location to another
    10·1 answer
  • the supreme court has ruled that it is unconstitutional to execute someone who committed his/her crime when he/she was under 18
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!