The statement that is is true concerning the company’s requirement to report to the SEC is that they a)Required to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports.
<h3>
What is sec?</h3>
SEC serves as the organization that protects investors through enforcement of nation's securities laws, against wrongdoers, and overseeing our securities markets .
Therefore, option A is correct.
Other options for the question are:
a)Required to report major business developments and must file annual and quarterly financial reports.
b)Not required to report information to the SEC.
c)Requirement to file depends on the company’s assets and shareholder base.
d)Must file annual and quarterly financial reports
Learn more about SEC on:
brainly.com/question/3798508
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer would be the Federal Court.
Explanation:
This is because the Federal Court covers the whole united states, and the State Court only covers a specific state.
I hope this helped!
The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.
