1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erik [133]
3 years ago
15

Importance of Community Policing

Law
1 answer:
Setler79 [48]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

community policing is important for following reasons

You might be interested in
Once a court determines that a waiver is appropriate in a particular case, what happens to the defendant?
Volgvan

Answer:

"Standard 15- 1.2. Waiver of trial by jury

(a) Cases required to be tried by jury should be so tried, unless jury trial is waived with the consent of the prosecutor.

(b) The court should not accept a waiver unless the defendant, after being advised by the court of his or her right to trial by jury and the consequences of waiver of jury trial, personally waives the right to trial by jury in writing or in open court on the record.

(c) A defendant may not withdraw a voluntary and knowing waiver as a matter of right, but the court, in its discretion, may permit withdrawal prior to the commencement of the trial.

(d) A defendant may withdraw a waiver of jury trial as a matter of right, and a prosecutor may withdraw consent to a waiver as a matter of right if there is a change in the trial judge.

Standard 15- 1.3. Waiver of full jury or of unanimous verdict*

(a) At any time before verdict, the parties, with the approval of the court, may stipulate that the jury shall consist of any number less than that required for a full jury.

(b) At any time before verdict, the parties, with the approval of the court, may stipulate that the verdict may be less than unanimous. The stipulation should be clear as to the number of concurring jurors required for the verdict to be valid.

(c) The court should not accept such a stipulation unless the defendant, after being advised by the court of his or her right to trial by a full jury, personally waives the right to trial by a full jury, or the right to a unanimous verdict, in open court on the record."

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
How did george mason feel about a powerful federal government?
OLga [1]

Answer:

who is George mason

Explanation:

plz tell me

7 0
3 years ago
Peter’s Uncle Douglas is a state legislator. He works very hard to represent the people who elected him. What is the main focus
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
While driving on a country road, you see roadside hazards that can be dangerous to cars. Which of the following is the
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

Notify your state.....

or rope it off and then notify them, though notifying may be the most effective

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
List the people involved in Carmela Coppilino’s death. Why is there a possible problem with her death certificate?
omeli [17]

This question is about the text "Dr. Coppolino's Deadly House Calls"

Answer and Explanation:

1. The possible people involved in Carmela's death are her husband Dr. Carl Coppolino and Dr. Karrow. That's because they probably gave a fake death certificate on Carmela's death. This is because when Dr. Karrow arrived home, Carmela was already dead and did not appear to have had a heart attack (as her husband had stated. On the contrary, it seemed that her death had been caused, but even so Dr. Karrow agreed to sign a state of death stating that Carmela had died of "coronary occlusion".

2. William Farber died of suffocation by the hands of Dr. Carl Coppolino, who used a pillow to kill Faber. he did this because Faber's wife had an affair with him and was unable to give her husband a lethal injection. The injection was given by Carl himself.

3. Because Marjorie Farber told the police how Carl murdered her husband and why he did it. The police then launched an investigation and realized that William Faber's death certificate indicated death from "coronary occlusion," a death that is rarely investigated by the police. After that, the police managed to obtain authorization to carry out the bodies of Camela and William Farber for an autopsy to be done, confirming that both did not die of "coronary occlusion," the police therefore decided to accuse Dr. Coppolinode of murdering his wife and William Farber.

4. Marjorie Farber had an affair with Dr. Carl Coppolino and decided to report it because she was sad when he decided to marry a wealthy socialite. She was portrayed in court as an embittered woman against a respected and professional doctor, which lightened her complaint. Furthermore, no chemical substances were found in William Farber's body, although there were indeed signs of strangulation. In the end Coppolino was not convicted because he was a professional doctor, while Marjorie was a betrayed and sad woman.

5. He proved that Carl Coppolino injected his wife with succinylcholine chloride. This substance is paralyzing and deadly, but its identification in the body is almost impossible, because it is degraded by two substances that happen naturally in the human organism. So Dr. Umberger created a new method to detect this substance. He managed to isolate, in Camelia's body, very high levels of succinic acid, which is a strong indication of the use of succinylcholine chloride

6. The Fryer standard would accept the process applied by the doctor as proof of Umberger's guilt. That's because Dr. Umberger was a toxicology expert and the Fryer standard states that within a trial, an expert's opinion should be accepted as evidence if he can use a scientifically recognized technique to prove the point, like Dr. Umberger did.

7. After presenting the facts discovered by Dr. Umberger, Dr. Coppolino was found guilty of the murder of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder.

8. We can consider that the case was tried within the Dauber Ruling, as it considered Dr. Umberger's methodology as a proof of Coppolino's guilt. However, the case of the murder of William Farber was also investigated by an expert, but it did not have the same result, probably for sexist reasons.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment?
    14·2 answers
  • Congress passed the Nursing Mothers Law in 2010, a law that requires employers to give nursing mothers break time and private sp
    9·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Group of answer choices reaffirmed the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson
    15·1 answer
  • How did William the Conqueror's 1066 A.D. Invasion of England further the concept of law in ways still practiced today?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following would MOST LIKELY be supported by the Democratic Party?
    8·2 answers
  • What is the primary reason to have three branches of government?
    8·2 answers
  • Explain sadness =_==_==_==_=​
    15·2 answers
  • Which court decision protected students’ rights to free speech as early as 1969?
    13·2 answers
  • The use of turn signals as a signal to the driver of other vehicles that it is safe to pass is:
    8·1 answer
  • Every community whether big or small needs guidelines that dictate the behaviour of the members of the group. The laws that gove
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!