Answer:
x = 2, y = - 1
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the 2 equations
y = - 7x + 13 → (1)
y = - 1 → (2)
Substitute y = - 7x + 13 into (2)
- 7x + 13 = - 1 ( subtract 13 from both sides )
- 7x = - 14 ( divide both sides by - 7 )
x = 2
y = - 1 is already given in (2)
Then x = 2, y = - 1
Answer:
Yes because of the Side-Angle Side postulate
Step-by-step explanation:
It is given that line BC is congruent to line BC
It is given that line AC is congruent to line EC
We now that angle DCE is congruent to angle ACB because they are vertical angles
I'm sorry if this is not the right explanation, but I do believe my answer is correct
First, you calculate the total amount of parts : 7 + 3 = 10
Next, divide the number by the total amount of parts : £500 ÷ 10 = £50
After that, you multiply the answer by the amount of parts needed on both sides of the ratio : £50 × 3 = £150 and £50 × 7 = £350
Finally put these answers back into the ratio : £150:£350
To check, make sure both sides of the ratio add up to the original number : £150 + £350 = £500
Answer:
its correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Malcolm is showing evidence of gambler's fallacy.
This is the tendency to think previous results can affect future performance of an event that is fundamentally random.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since each round of the roulette-style game is independent of each other. The probability that 8 will come up at any time remains the same, equal to the probability of each number from 1 to 10 coming up. That it has not come up in the last 15 minutes does not increase or decrease the probability that it would come up afterwards.