Adverse selection describes situations when high-risk persons are more likely to receive insurance or when one bargaining side has important knowledge that the other does not. Our goal is to influence decision-makers, both inside and outside of government, to consider the future and adopt long-term plans.
When vendors and/or purchasers have different knowledge about a certain component of a product's quality, this is referred to as adverse selection. Thus, those who work in hazardous environments or lead high-risk lives are more likely to buy life or disability insurance, knowing that they will likely be able to use it.
To learn more on world bank
brainly.com/question/3520105
#SPJ4
Answer:
Comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability to produce good and services at a lower opportunity cost compared to others , leading to lower selling price and competitive advantage over others .
Specialization is about concentrating on producing a few products in order to
build brands , expertise and gain maximum productivity leading to a reduction in selling price and a comparative advantage.
Answer:
1. an amount after continuing operations.
Explanation:
In preparing the income statement the transactions resulting into gain or loss from the discontinued operations are always reported in income statement.
For this there is special heading that is
Amount after continuing operations
This basically reflects the gain or loss from the sale of such segment.
This provides for reporting all the transactions as part of business but in an highlighted manner.
Night shift employee's always get paid more than day shiff
Answer:
First of all, an auditor must be skeptical about the information that he/she is gathering and analyzing. They should try to get as much audit evidence as they can in order to form an opinion. But an auditor can also reasonably assure that there are no material misstatements, either intentional or not intentional.
Most auditor procedures are intended to discover unintentional misstatements, but intentional misstatements are very hard to discover because more than one individual (or even a very large group) might have colluded in order to conceal them. The auditor gets his information from the controller, internal auditor, and other people within the organization, but what if they all colluded in order to conceal their bad actions.
E.g. an auditor should check for shipping receipts to be complete, accurate and in order, but he/she relies on information given by the same people that he/she is evaluating. The auditor can conclude that the shipping reports are complete, but he/she cannot state that they are true and valid because he/she wasn't there.
