Its A, its illogical whether he cures or he mistakenly kills he gets his pay.
The correct answer is B. Through the words "such a success with a single book", it suggests that García Marquez was succesful thanks to a singles novel, unlike other recipients or possible candidates to the Nobel prize in literature. The excerpt suggests that Garcia Marquez's award has decreased the chance of other writers who are not as proficient as him, to get the award. As the option states, nobel prize winners usually publish more than one sucessful book, that is they have a long and sucessful career. So, a writer who win the award because lf just one book sets the standard too high for future Nobel prize winners
nobody
eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
What we found on account of Wes is really run of the mill and illustrative of the circumstance that you have with ex-cons. A considerable lot of these individuals are baffled with school. They don't have professional educations. They have a record so they're not legitimately qualified for a ton of employments, and to that, you include the weight of youngsters. They're frequently not invited by their family or have problematic relations with them, and we're soliciting them to end up noticeably upstanding individuals from society.
That was a standout amongst the most awful meetings with Wes, when we met particularly to discuss that. After that I went to my auto, and I was not able drive for 30 minutes since I was endeavoring to ingest that he was so near accomplishing something with himself, but then how far he was and didn't know. We have to make sense of a superior approach to address recidivism in this nation and locate a superior approach to enable those individuals who to have served their obligation to society, since we can't keep on paying for this monetarily and ethically - having individuals with rap sheets as long as their arm on the grounds that by and large they don't have the foggiest idea about some other way.
