1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
m_a_m_a [10]
3 years ago
10

What does “ the state is much more interested in how you die than in how you live” mean ? What does it mean for American citizen

s?
History
1 answer:
Leni [432]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The meaning behind the statement “ the state is much more interested in how you die than in how you live” is that the government wants to find the major causes of death and reduce them.

The meaning for American citizens is that the government wants to improve their lives.

Explanation:

First of all, this is a very good sociological question, because they allow us to perceive the posture of the government in their attempt to increase its citizens' quality of life. That is the reason why the government wants to know how you die, so they can reduce the unnatural causes of death to increase your quality of life. Also, that is very important for American citizens as the government wants to know the citizens' causes of death to reduce them as much as possible to leave the natural ones alone.

You might be interested in
An electrician needs 3 rolls of electrical wire to wire each room in a house. How many rooms can he wire with 1/2 of a roll
GaryK [48]

Answer: 6 rooms

Explanation:

3/1 ÷ 1/2 = 6/1

6 0
3 years ago
Describe to your teacher what the preamble means to America today
Softa [21]

Answer:The Preamble of the Constitution of the United States is a succinct introduction that establishes our framers' goals for our government. The Preamble was actually written after our Founders had nearly finalized the text of the Constitution. Today, it reminds us of the exceptional nature of our government structure.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the north punish the south and why?
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

one punishment that the South faced was being divided into 5 military ... The North had only a handful of battles in their territory so Northerners did not feel

Explanation:

In March, eighteen sixty-eight, Congress tried to remove President Andrew Johnson from office. At that time, Congress was controlled by radical members of the Republican Party. They opposed Johnson, a Democrat.

Congress failed to remove Johnson. But it did succeed in getting control of efforts to re-build the South following America's Civil War.

Radical Republicans wanted to punish the South for starting the war. They also wanted to be sure new governments in the southern states would support the Republican Party.

I'm Frank Oliver. Today, Doug Johnson and I tell about this reconstruction.

One way radical Republicans gained support was by helping give blacks the right to vote. They knew former slaves would vote for the party which had freed them.

Another way Republicans kept control in the South was by preventing whites from voting there. They passed a law saying no southerner could vote if he had taken part in the rebellion against the Union. This prevented the majority of southern whites from voting for Democrats and against Republicans.

Congress also made strong rules about what southern states had to do to re-enter the Union. It said each of the states needed a new constitution that protected the voting rights of all black men. And it said each southern state must approve an amendment to the United States Constitution that gave citizenship to blacks.

The radicals did not rest with changes in the law. They also sent their supporters south to organize blacks for the Republican Party. Many southern whites hated these men from the North. They had a special name for them: carpetbaggers.

The name arose because many of the northerners who went south arrived with all their possessions in a carpet handbag. Southerners also had a name for their own people who cooperated with the carpetbaggers. They called them scalawags. Neither name was friendly.

Southern whites had a reason to be bitter. They had lost the Civil War. Now much of their power was gone, and they were suffering. But there was another side to the story, as well.

Southern whites had held black people in slavery for many years. Now, the former slaves were getting to enjoy a small taste of freedom. Also, the South had started the Civil War which had caused so much death and destruction. It was not surprising that the North showed little sympathy when the fighting stopped and the South lay in ruins.

Southern states organized conventions to form new governments. Soon, all but three southern states had new legislatures.

Not surprisingly, radical Republicans held firm control in every one of the new governments. Many of the new governors and state officials were carpetbaggers from outside the state. Others were southern scalawags.

Many of these new state officials were dishonest. They began using their power to become rich.

In South Carolina, for example, the new governor was a former army officer from the state of Ohio. He gave government jobs to many dishonest men, including some who were wanted for crimes in other states.

The same situation existed in other state governments in the South. In Louisiana, for example, the governor was a carpetbagger from the state of Illinois. He left office after four years with one million dollars. His official pay during that time was only thirty-two thousand

The South was not the only place where public offic

5 0
3 years ago
The striking feature of the Jacksonian era was
Jobisdone [24]
<span>Men of good family rose quickly to positions of great economic and political power the disappearance of social classes the beginning of American democracy an increase in the influence of the common man

(found from Quizlet)</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a group of people pillaged a town, what did they do to the town? they took valuable items from the town. they decided to sett
DerKrebs [107]
<span>In my point of view if a group of people pillaged a town,they took valuable items from the town.Because if they are good minded people they will ask help from other villagers there is no need to pillage the town.If they are evil minded and more dangerous they decided to settle in the town.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statements an event that contributed to the decline of the Aztec empire.
    14·2 answers
  • How was Samuel slater able to build the first factory in the United States
    11·1 answer
  • Why did belgium join world war 1
    13·1 answer
  • Who began plotting a coup to overthrow Ngo Dinh Diem?
    9·2 answers
  • hey i got another question im pretty sure that its Eisenhower but it might also be Roosevelt While President Truman ultimately m
    8·2 answers
  • How did the transition from a command economy to a market economy affect the Russians
    8·1 answer
  • Can some 1 answer my last two questions they are the same so you get 20 pts !!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • How did the native Americans react to the westward expansion and American system
    9·2 answers
  • How did the Bessemer Process make steel more affordable?
    12·1 answer
  • Somebody help this person he or she says he is depressed , somebody just help this person to not com it sucde
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!