1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kruka [31]
2 years ago
12

I NEED HELP PLLZLZLZLZLZLZLZLZLLZ

History
1 answer:
jeka57 [31]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Your kingly ship. Please allow me to introduce a new idea to the court. This new idea is for religious reform. We have been very bad people and we need to repent for our sins. If you allow me to help guide our people toward salvation then we may become a better and greater nation than all the rest.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Hey what are yall people doing today
denis23 [38]

Answer:

school

Explanation:

math and science

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the goals of capitalists lead to the mistreatment of workers?​
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

People as a whole would own all property and businesses. This would result in a fairer distribution of goods and services among people.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unne
MaRussiya [10]

As we celebrate the 4th of July, let's ask the question: Did the Framers make a mistake by amending the Constitution with the Bill of Rights? Would Americans have more liberty today had there not been a Bill of Rights? You say, "Williams, what's wrong with you? America without the Bill of Rights is unthinkable!" Let's look at it.

After the 1787 Constitutional Convention, there were intense ratification debates about the proposed Constitution. Both James Madison and Alexander Hamilton expressed grave reservations about Thomas Jefferson's, George Mason's and others insistence that the Constitution be amended by the Bill of Rights. It wasn't because they had little concern with liberty guarantees. Quite to the contrary they were concerned about the loss of liberties.

Alexander Hamilton expressed his concerns in Federalist Paper No. 84, "[B]ills of rights . . . are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous." Hamilton asks, "For why declare that things shall not be done [by Congress] which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given [to Congress] by which restrictions may be imposed?" Hamilton's argument was that Congress can only do what the Constitution specifically gives it authority to do. Powers not granted belong to the people and the states. Another way of putting Hamilton's concern: why have an amendment prohibiting Congress from infringing on our right to play hopscotch when the Constitution gives Congress no authority to infringe upon our hopscotch rights in the first place.

Alexander Hamilton added that a Bill of Rights would "contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more [powers] than were granted. . . . [it] would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power." Going back to our hopscotch example, those who would usurp our God-given liberties might enact a law banning our playing hide-and-seek. They'd justify their actions by claiming that nowhere in the Constitution is there a guaranteed right to play hide-and-seek. They'd say, "hopscotch yes, but hide-and-seek, no."

To mollify Alexander Hamilton's fears about how a Bill of Rights might be used as a pretext to infringe on human rights, the Framers added the Ninth Amendment. The Ninth Amendment reads: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Boiled down to its basics, the Ninth Amendment says it's impossible to list all of our God-given or natural rights. Just because a right is not listed doesn't mean it can be infringed upon or disparaged by the U.S. Congress. Applying the Ninth Amendment to our example: just because playing hopscotch is listed and hide-and-seek is not doesn't mean that we don't have a right to play hide-and-seek.

How do courts see the Ninth Amendment today? It's more than a safe bet to say that courts, as well as lawyers, treat the Ninth Amendment with the deepest of contempt. In fact, I believe, that if any appellant's lawyer argued Ninth Amendment protections on behalf of his client, he would be thrown out of court if not disbarred. That's what the Ninth Amendment has come to mean today. I believe we all have a right to privacy, but how do you think a Ninth Amendment argument claiming privacy rights would fly with information gathering agencies like the Internal Revenue Service? Try to assert your rights to privacy in dealing with the IRS and other government agencies and I'll send you cigarettes and candy while you're in jail.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In your own words, describe the Doctrine of Nullification.
ki77a [65]

Answer:

Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional with respect to the United States Constitution

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Please help is 1 question not too much, don’t do the others that are crossed off
stira [4]

Answer:

He was the leader of the Military and he was very determined to exterminate leftism in Chile and to reassert free market policies in the countries economy

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the us introduse the marshell plan in the post war era?
    11·1 answer
  • How were schools changed by the nazis
    10·1 answer
  • Cyprus was in a strategic:
    10·2 answers
  • What products were most common along the colonies along the colonies' western frontier?
    14·1 answer
  • What issue started the violence in the Kansas territory?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the pawn for in chess
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of how the Mongols discriminated against the Chinese?
    5·2 answers
  • Explain the alliance system in Europe. How did Nationalism, secret alliances, and competition create tension in Europe?
    6·1 answer
  • Name the triple alies of the world war​
    13·2 answers
  • The implied power of congress
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!