1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firlakuza [10]
3 years ago
15

Companies Heidee and Leaudy are virtually identical in that they are both profitable, and they have the same total assets (TA),

Sales (S), return on assets (ROA), and profit margin (PM). However, Company Heidee has the higher debt ratio. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. Company Heidee has a lower operating income (EBIT) than Company LD
b. Company Heidee has a lower total assets turnover than Company Leaudy.
c. Company Heidee has a lower equity multiplier than Company Leaudy.
d. Company Heidee has a higher fixed assets turnover than Company Leaudy.
e. Company Heidee has a higher ROE than Company Leaudy.
Business
1 answer:
ale4655 [162]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

e. Company Heidee has a higher ROE than Company Leaudy.

Explanation:

Return on equity measures how well the management of a business uses owner's equity to get returns. It is calculated by dividing net income by owner's equity.

That is

ROE= Net Income ÷ Owner's equity

Considering the accounting equation

Asset= Liability + Owner equity

Owner equity= Asset - Liability

From the equation when a company that take on more debt owner's equity will reduce.

The effect of reduction in owner's equity on Return on Equity is that it will increase the ratio, since owner's equity is the denominator.

In this scenario both companies have the same profit margin so if company Heidee has higher debt ratio it follows that it also has a higher ROE than Company Leaudy

You might be interested in
Deductible transportation expenses: a.Do not include daily expenses for transportation between the taxpayer's home and temporary
ad-work [718]

Answer: c. Do not include the normal costs of commuting

Explanation: deductible expenses do not include the normal costs of commuting. Deductible expenses can be subtracted from a company's income before it is subject to income tax. Therefore they reduce tax liability. Utilities, wages, rent, auto expenses, meals and entertainment, some business expenses such as advertising, employee benefits, insurance etc. are examples of expenses that can be deducted from a company's income.

3 0
2 years ago
You are selling a product in an area where 30 % of the people live in the city and the rest live in the suburbs. Currently 20 %
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

a). I would adopt the increase in market share in the suburbs by 15 % since the number of final suburbs dwellers who will use my product is (0.0805 x) which is  greater than final city dwellers' (0.075 x)

b). The total percentage of people who are city dwellers who own your product before the new sales drive=46.15%

Explanation:

a). We can make the following expressions;

Total number of both city dwellers and suburb dwellers=x

City dwellers=30% of x=(30/100)×x=0.3 x

Suburb dweller=70% of x=(70/100)×x=0.7 x

Total number of city dwellers who use your product initially=(20/100)×0.3 x=0.06 x

Total number of suburb dwellers who use your product initially=(10/100)×0.7 x=0.07 x

If we increase the market share in the suburbs by 15%

Number of suburb dwellers=0.07 x+(15/100)×0.07 x

Number of suburb dwellers=(0.07 x+0.0105 x)=0.0805 x

If we increase market share in the city by 25%

Number of city dwellers=0.06 x+(25/100)×0.06 x

Number of city dwellers=(0.06 x+0.015 x)=0.075 x

I would adopt the increase in market share in the suburbs by 15 % since the number of final suburbs dwellers who will use my product is (0.0805 x) which is  greater than final city dwellers' (0.075 x)

b). Percentage of city dwellers that own your product

Percentage=(Initial number of city dwellers/Total number of people)×100

Percentage=0.06 x/(0.06 x+0.07 x)=(0.06 x/0.13 x)×100=46.15%

The total percentage of people who are city dwellers who own your product before the new sales drive=46.15%

8 0
3 years ago
Hoosier Manufacturing operates a production shop that is designed to have the lowest unit production cost at an output rate of 1
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

124.38%

Explanation:

capacity utilization rate is the rate at which productive capacity or output is being utilized. It is denoted by the equation:

Capacity utilization = [actual output/ potential output] %

= (45,400/365) %

=124.38%

8 0
3 years ago
During​ recessions, American firms lay off a larger proportion of their workers than Japanese firms do. ​ (It has been claimed t
bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

The answer is "choice a"

Explanation:

In the given question the missing choices is added in attached file please find it.

The additional output produced through hiring an extra item of such an input reflects the marginal product (MP). For the very first time. for example, its marginal labor productivity was increased output generated by recruiting additional work.  

This law diminishing marginal returns as more as units that even the marginal result of even an input, that is hired input.  

In other words, any additional work input would generate less than a previous employee because recruiting additional workers decreases expected revenue on jobs, the laid-off of employees, which means the Labor would grow expected revenue.  

In Japan is laying off fewer employees even despite the slowdown it continues to produce strong outputs. The lower-priced revenues and their work remain constant along with their steady overall performance.  

Your medium product (total) item divided by total work would stay intact. United states staff layover to the other side. It laid-off the staff equals higher marginal labor for overall returns it's going to be higher production besides that, lower labor in the United States could mean an increase in the gross labor output but a larger for Japan, more then, that's why the choice a is correct.

3 0
3 years ago
2. Simplify.<br>a) 8x7 +4<br>c) 20 x 3 + 10​
valina [46]

Answer:

a) nothing can be done

b)70

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A few years ago, simon powell purchased a home for $225,000. today, the home is worth $400,000. his remaining mortgage balance i
    7·1 answer
  • Investing $1,500,000 in TQM's Channel Support Systems initiative will at a minimum increase demand for your products 1.7% in thi
    14·1 answer
  • Gains or losses on cash flow hedges are Group of answer choices ignored completely. recorded in equity, as part of other compreh
    13·1 answer
  • If firms can easily enter and exit a​ market, then A. firms will produce at minimum average cost in the short run. B. firms will
    12·1 answer
  • ÂOaktree, Inc. is a merchandiser of inlaid wooden boxes. The company sold 7,500 units during the year. The company has provided
    7·1 answer
  • Only very large businesses can become corporations.<br> A. true<br> B. false
    6·1 answer
  • It is possible that a(n) ________ vertical marketing system can be more formally structured through strategic alliances and part
    11·1 answer
  • When crafting a business message with strong reasoning, it is important to back claims with Multiple choice question. broad gene
    6·1 answer
  • What is business activity?​
    7·1 answer
  • when your colleague says, "i’ll go along with whatever is best for you" she is showing what interpersonal conflict management st
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!