according to dr. james reason, there are two types of human failure which can occur. they are:
Dynamic and Latent
The human failure issue can be seen in two ways: the individual methodology and the framework approach. Each has its model of mistake causation and each model leads to very various ways of thinking of blunder the executives.
Understanding these distinctions has significant commonsense ramifications for adapting to the always present gamble of accidents in clinical practice.
to learn more about human failure.
brainly.com/question/19575648
#SPJ4
Answer:
The politics of Canada function within a framework of parliamentary democracy and a federal system of parliamentary government with strong democratic traditions. Canada is a constitutional monarchy, in which the monarch is head of state. ... Canada has placed emphasis on equality and inclusiveness for all its people
Hi!
These individuals are going to have a type B personality. Whenever you hear this, if you play video games - you can think of Sans from Undertale!
Hopefully, this helps! =)
Answer:
Explanation:
In the 1830s, American abolitionists, led by Evangelical Protestants, gained momentum in their battle to end slavery. Abolitionists believed that slavery was a national sin, and that it was the moral obligation of every American to help eradicate it from the American landscape by gradually freeing the slaves and returning them to Africa.. Not all Americans agreed. Views on slavery varied state by state, and among family members and neighbors. Many Americans—Northerners and Southerners alike—did not support abolitionist goals, believing that anti-slavery activism created economic instability and threatened the racial social order.
But by the mid-nineteenth century, the ideological contradictions between a national defense of slavery on American soil on the one hand, and the universal freedoms espoused in the Declaration of Independence on the other hand, had created a deep moral schism in the national culture. During the thirty years leading up to the Civil War, anti-slavery organizations proliferated, and became increasingly effective in their methods of resistance. As the century progressed, branches of the abolitionist movement became more radical, calling for the immediate end of slavery. Public opinion varied widely, and different branches of the movement disagreed on how to achieve their aims. But abolitionists found enough strength in their commonalities—a belief in individual liberty and a strong Protestant evangelical faith—to move their agenda forward
