His total sales were "x"
now, we know that 3.5% of "x" plus 5% of "x", will add up to his total commission, including sales of 6500 or less or more
so the commission for 6500 or less, is 3.5% of "x" or (3.5/100)*x -> 0.035x
the commission for above 6500 is 5% or (5/100) * x --> 0.05x
we know, that both commissions added together, are $415
thus
0.035x + 0.05x = 415 <----- solve for "x"
Answer: 1440°
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve the above question, we'll use the formula (n-2) × 180. In this question, we are told that it has 10 sides. This implies that n= 10. Therefore, using the formula goes thus:
= (n - 2) × 180
where, n = 10
= (10 - 2) × 180
= 8 × 180
= 1440
Answer:
Angle PTR and angle PTS are supplementary angles. Lines PQ and RS intersect at an angle less than a right angle. Angle PTR and angle PTS are complementary angles.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
$6,120
Step-by-step explanation:
1/5 (one-fifth) of the family's annual income ($30,600) is spent on housing- as the word problem states.
You have to find 1/5 (one-fifth) of* $30,600.
Write it out as an equation.
*The <em>of</em><em> </em>in the word equation (1/5 of 30600) simply means multiplication.
Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.
