The statement that is not true for goodness-of-fit tests is: A. Expected frequencies must be whole numbers.
<h3>What is Goodness-of-fit tests?</h3>
Goodness-of-fit tests can be defined as the test conducted to help find out whether the observe value work hand in hand with expected value or the observe value is different from the expected value.
The statement is not true because it is not must for expected frequencies to be whole number despite the fact that expected frequencies are whole numbers.
Therefore the statement that is not true for goodness-of-fit tests is: A. Expected frequencies must be whole numbers.
Learn more about Goodness-of-fit tests here:brainly.com/question/16910222
#SPJ1
Answer:
GOOD QUESTION
Step-by-step explanation:
WHEN I FIND OUT ILL HELP YOU
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Cannot give you the number because we are not given the diagram.
However, it will be exactly the same as the measure of angle R in the original triangle PQR.
Rotation and dilation do not change angles.
Yuto is correct because he isolated the variable correctly and reversed the inequality symbol.
x < 3
Answer:
$80 is the 100% original price
The sale price is $56 with 30% off and $24 in savings.
Step-by-step explanation:
We can write a proportion. We know that $24 is a 30% off discount of an unknown original price. Let's call it x. We write equal ratios of comparing percent and comparing the 24 to the original price. We then set them equal.
We then cross multiply across the equal sign from numerator to the opposite numerator.
30(x)=24(100)
30x=2400
We divide to find x.
x=80.
Since we saved $24 as a discount, the sale price would be 80-24=56.