Answer:
c. Inductive and Strong
Step-by-step explanation:
In inductive reasoning, provided data is analyzed in order to reach a conclusion. In this case, the argument provides data regarding Jane and Nancy's awards and their love for mathematics and then draws a conclusion regarding Nancy's performance in a particular class, this is an example of inductive reasoning.
As for the strength of the argument, it is plausible to infer that Jane and Nancy have similar mathematics skills since they both love calculus and excel academically. Therefore, if Jane does well in the calculus class, it is a strong argument to say that Nancy does as well.
The answer is :
c. Inductive and Strong
In this question, the first information that we get is that Kayla spent half of her weekly allowance in clothes. On cleaning the oven Kayla gets $4. Finally Kayla is left with $12.
Let us assume that the weekly allowance of Kayla = x
Amount of allowance saved after buying clothes = x/2
Then we can go for the equation
x/2 + 4 = 12
x + (4 * 2) = 12 * 2
x + 8 = 24
x = 24 -8
= 16
So we can now see that the weekly allowance of Kayla is $16
M1= 5 , M2=1
Explanation:
12-3m-4-5/m=0
8-3m-5/m=0
(8-3m-5/m=0) * m
8m-3m^2-5=0
8m-3m^2=5
m(8-3m)=5
m1=5
m2=> (8-3m)=5
3m=3
m2= 1
Answer:
8.3
Step-by-step explanation:use law of cosine
solve equation
substitute
simplify
