Answer:had to exercise discretion in D.All of these are correct
Explanation:
What is meant by exercising discretion?
Exercising discretion means one doesn't make a haste decision but they first consider other factors before they act. Those factors need to be evaluated in terms of which matters the most.
A.He had to consider whether to shoot the suspect
- officers are not supposed to just shoot the suspect in haste without a reason to believe that the suspect poses a threat to them like when they pull a gun and shoot back.
B.He had to consider whether the shots fired were coming from the suspect
- If the suspect isn't the one shooting back it would not be called for to shoot he suspect but the person who is shooting.
C.He had to consider his safety and the safety for others
- firing shots may put people around in danger or in the line of fire where innocent people could die.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer: Take an active role
Explanation:
According to the given given question, throughout our career we should take an action in the system development for creating the various types of information system which helps in meets the actual requirement.
By actively taking actions in the system development as it helps in maintaining, developing and also recreating the information system more effectively.
The system development is helps in implementing various types of information system applications by proper designing and testing so that we can manage it according to our needs.
Therefore, Take an active role is the correct answer.
The answer would be Pollution. Pollution is an example of a negative externality, which refer to various factors that resulted from company's productivity. One of the common example of this is the air pollution , which will bring harm to the environment
Answer:
Necesita un ambiente saludable o entonces los animales y plantas en ese ambiente no sobrevivirán. Un ambiente saludable es ideal para las criaturas vivientes allí para que puedan tener agua, aire y verduras / plantas saludables. No sé si esta es la respuesta que querías, pero puedes decirme si no obtuve tu respuesta.
Explanation:
