The central idea of this text is that although rare earth minerals are crucial to human existence, the process of mining and extracting them is taking a toll on the ecological vicinity of the earth.
<h3>What is a central idea?</h3>
The central idea of a discourse is the overarching and dominant thought that reverberates all through the text.
When one is done reading a text, the thought that lingers, the impression that one is left with is what is called the central idea.
The text goes on to buttress the need for mining rare earth materials by exploring the politics behind it.
The author in connection with this mentions that Biden's administration is more concerned with economic independence and political rivalry than the real problems posed by the mining of the rare earth minerals.
Learn more about rate earth minerals at:
brainly.com/question/8677298
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. Both b) and c) are correct.
Explanation:
Consumer surplus is the difference between the total profit we get from service and its market price. This means that the first unit to acquire we value it highly but as we acquire additional units our valuation falls. However, the price we pay for any unit is always the same.
Thanks for your question!
Go to the DMV or look at their website
Answer:
high performance/ confirmation.
Explanation:
This question wants to test us on the issue related to customer experience. In order for a company or business organization to be able to make a lot of money they must be able to give satisfaction to their consumers or customers(especially when the company is competing with other companies offering similar products or services).
There is this general saying that "customers are always" right which means that customers deserves nothing but the best.
In order to be able to solve this question we have to consider the Expectation confirmation theory. The theory is about customer expectations met with high performance will create great confirmation which will lead to customer satisfaction.
Answer:
See explaination
Explanation:
1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.
2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing
