Media coverage gives voters an impression of the candidates.
Because much of media coverage comes in very brief news segments and even short "sound bites," it tends to provide an impression of the candidates, without necessarily providing in-depth presentation and analysis of their views. This varies, of course, depending on which "media" you have in mind with the question. Committed news organizations which employ highly skilled journalists will do deeper pieces on candidates and their views or policies -- see, for instance, articles in The New York Times or Washington Post or The Atlantic.
There are many new forms of media--such as social media websites and politically-aligned cable networks--where people can go to get biased perspectives and be told how to vote or not to vote. But the most respected media outets strive to present a full picture and cover all candidates. Still, because most voters will watch or read only portions of news media coverage, the best answer is that media tends to give voters an impression of candidates -- which sometimes is less complete than the full picture.
<h3> He tried to increase us oil production.
As a result of a revolution in Iran during 1978 and 1979, the cartel of countries controlling part of the oil market decided to stop production.</h3>
The head of government in a Parliamentary system would be the Prime Minister.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
its the glowy thingy in the fog..
Explanation:
Answer:
The Treaty of Versailles has been criticized as a vindictive agreement that violated the spirit of Wilson's fourteen points. The harsh term hurt the German economy in the 1920's and contributed to the popularity of leaders such as Hitler who argued for the restoration of German honor through remilitarization.
