Answer + Explanation:
As the society grows more and more health conscious, stronger voices to ban smoking in all public areas begin to emerge. Banning public has been used as a mean for government to discourage smoking and also to improve city image. It is almost impossible to achieve consensus on this issue as it creates great inconvenience for the smokers. However, I believe smoking should be banned in public places and my reasons are as follow.
Looking at the <em>health aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because it is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the others. Cigarette is a known carcinogen that has been associated with increased rates of lung cancer and heart disease. However, the hazard does not end there, second-hand smoke has been proven to create more detrimental effects on health on both the smokers and the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immune systems such as children and elderly.
Looking at the <em>sociological aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because smoking is a personal choice. One’s personal enjoyment should not be at the expense of others’ health. When a person smokes in indoor public areas such as restaurants and shopping centres, pollutants continue to circulate the premise and affecting the health of everyone within the building. It is unfair for the non-smokers to be forced to share the health risks of the smokers.
To sum up, public places are shared by all, smokers and non-smokers, old and young, and should be made friendly to all. <u>Negative effects of smoking go beyond the smoker himself, creating health problems of the public.</u> While some choose to accept the side effects of smoking, risks of smoking should not be forced upon others. Therefore, in my humble opinions, smoking should be banned in public places.
I disagree of open book tests being harder than traditional tests; what is open book tests to you? <em>On every answer do you get to cheat to use your book? </em>I disagree, because on the final tests <em>or the STAAR tests, </em>you won't be using <u>open book.</u> What will you do then, if you only use open book? Traditional tests you won't have any book, not one. What will you do then, if you switched from always open books to a normal, better traditional test? <u>Students need to be more prepared; schools can't </u><em><u>let</u></em><u> them cheat. Open book tests are just something the teachers give to their students to make it easier.</u> This is why I believe open book tests are much <em>easier </em> than traditional tests, that is why I fully disagree when you say that Open Book tests are harder than traditional test.
Can I have brainliest or no
Noah feels like he's wasting all his time and youth and that makes him sad and depressed every day. Noah is a young man of 24, who enjoys full health and a willingness to live, but lives in an extremely small city with no hope of development, without any attractions, or anything that provides entertainment. He no longer has any friends, because his childhood friends have already left the city to reach new horizons, only he was left behind watching the years go by and the sadness getting stronger and stronger.
He is very afraid to stay that way forever. Then one day, in an act of courage and impulsiveness, Noah decided that he would travel for a month in South America. He was afraid and knew that after that month he would have to go back to his peaceful and decadent life again, but he would experience, something new, would do something for himself, travel, and put himself in a totally different, unpredictable, and challenging situation.
And so he followed his plan and left for South America. He visited almost every country and got to know new cultures, meet people, taste foods he never heard of, and witness innovative scenarios for him. After that month he returned home, he knew that his life would not change, but he had a sense of accomplishment and could hardly wait for the new adventure.
