The correct answer is Rights View of Ethics.
<u>Rights-based ethics</u> is a concept whereby all humans have rights based only on the fact that they are human. These rights are natural rights (moral ones) and conventional rights as created by the society in which that person lives in (different values). The opposite of rights based ethics are<u> utilitarian ethics</u>, which are based on the maximization of "good outcomes" and minimizations of "bad outcomes." An example of a rights-based ethics is: The right to freely practice a religion of choice; an example of an utilitarian ethics is: that it would be acceptable to torture someone to gain information to save others as it would have a positive net outcome.
Answer:
The given claim: "The good depends on the results of what you do." which refers to the concept of Consequentialism.
Explanation:
Consequentialism:
It is such a philosophy that is based on the following principles:
- The act may be considered good or bad depending upon its good or bad results.
- The more good results an act produce, the more right will be the act.
- The problem with the given claim is that the person who follow this theory can say that: It is good to murder a X person as this X person is dangerous for some 50 people. Because this act of murdering is giving relief to 50 people so the murder of a single person is justifiable.
Hello,
First of all a historian is a person who makes comments about the events which happened in the past. A historian does this by using lots of different sources. One of the sources used can be the data obtained by the archaelogist. The reason for this is An archaeologist makes some researches to break ground and takes out something important about the events happened in the past. The objects found by an archaeologist helps a Historian to understand the history briefly what happened in the past. They are really different specialist but they always help each other and this help facilitates their understanding
Given : Men's division : 4313 seconds with a standard deviation of 583 seconds
Ladies' division : 5261 seconds with a standard deviation of 807 seconds
Leo completed the race : 4948 seconds
Mary completed the race : 5513 seconds
Leo : Z=4313-4948/583=-1.0892
Mary : Z= 5261-5513/807=-.3123
They both ran below the mean. Leo, more than one standard deviation while Mary was not even a half a SD below the mean.
