All categories

3 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!! NEED ASAP PLEASE!

Business

2 answers:

zhenek [66]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

C. Layaway

Explanation:

Just did this question.

Zarrin [17]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

b is your answer

Explanation:

You might be interested in

A Liquidation of a partnership LO P5 Kendra, Cogley, and Mei share income and loss in a 3:2:1 ratio (in ratio form: Kendra, 3/6;

morpeh [17]

Answer:

a. Inventory is sold for $608,400.

gain on sale of inventory = $608,400 - $537,600 = $70,800

allocation of gain:

Kendra 1/2 x $70,800 = $35,400

Cogley 1/3 x $70,800 = $23,600

Mei 1/6 x $70,800 = $11,800

Dr Cash 608,400

Cr Inventory 537,600

Cr Gain on sale of inventory 70,800

Dr Gain on sale of inventory 70,800

Cr Kendra, capital 35,400

Cr Cogley, capital 23,600

Cr Mei, capital 11,800

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Kendra, capital 112,100

Dr Cogley, capital 196,175

Dr Mei, capital 146,025

Cr Cash 454,300

b. Inventory is sold for $469,200.

loss on sale of inventory = $469,200 - $537,600 = -$69,400

allocation of loss:

Kendra 1/2 x $68,400 = $34,200

Cogley 1/3 x $68,400 = $22,800

Mei 1/6 x $68,400 = $11,400

Dr Cash 469,200

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 68,400

Cr Inventory 537,600

Dr Kendra, capital 34,300

Dr Cogley, capital 22,800

Dr Mei, capital 11,400

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 68,400

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Kendra, capital 42,400

Dr Cogley, capital 149,775

Dr Mei, capital 122,825

Dr Cash 315,100

c) c. Inventory is sold for $358,800 and any partners with capital deficits pay in the amount of their deficits.

loss on sale of inventory = $358,800 - $537,600 = -$178,800

allocation of loss:

Kendra 1/2 x $178,800 = $89,400

Cogley 1/3 x $178,800 = $59,600

Mei 1/6 x $178,800 = $29,800

Dr Cash 358,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 178,800

Cr Inventory 537,600

Dr Kendra, capital 89,400

Dr Cogley, capital 59,600

Dr Mei, capital 29,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 178,800

Dr Cash 12,700

Cr Kendra, capital 12,700

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Cogley, capital 112,975

Dr Mei, capital 104,425

Dr Cash 217,400

d. Inventory is sold for $298,800 and the partners have no assets other than those invested in the partnership.

loss on sale of inventory = $298,800 - $537,600 = -$238,800

allocation of loss:

Kendra 1/2 x $238,800 = $119,400

Cogley 1/3 x $238,800 = $79,600

Mei 1/6 x $238,800 = $39,800

Dr Cash 298,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 238,800

Cr Inventory 537,600

Dr Kendra, capital 119,400

Dr Cogley, capital 79,600

Dr Mei, capital 39,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 238,800

Dr Cogley, capital 28,467

Dr Mei, capital 14,233

Cr Kendra, capital 42,700

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Cogley, capital 64,508

Dr Mei, capital 80,192

Dr Cash 144,700

6 0

3 years ago

Select a business/company that you feel does not understand the psychology of waiting and provide examples in their process wher

kramer

Answer:

Let us pick the case of the organization known as Starbucks. Presently we will give 3 models according to which we feel that it doesn't comprehend the brain science of holding up in their procedure where they could deal with the client's view of standing by better utilizing the guideline from the Norman and Maister's articles. While holding up at a Starbucks behind a tremendous line, we can have numerous cases :

a) Uncertain Waits Are Longer than Explained Waits - There is no clarification or sureness with respect to how a lot of time it will take for the espresso or your refreshment to be conveyed while you are in that line. This is questionable as the client's before you would request mass requests which may take additional time than only one espresso. In this way, these holds up are questionable.

b) Occupied Time Feels Shorter than Unoccupied Time - While you are remaining in that line, you have an inclination that your 5-10 minutes have been squandered which you could have better used busy working or at home. In this manner, the time was abandoned and hence feels a waste. While on the off chance that the time was involved by some different methods in the line, at that point it would have been justified, despite all the trouble to remain in the line.

c) Individual Waits Feel Longer than Group - Now very likely in a line, we will have people who are standing by solo for their request in the line. In this manner, the performance hold up will feel longer than holding up in an organization of companions or additionally little converses with outsiders or conveying here and there. In this manner, the issue of solo holding up is a distress and it remains.

5 0

3 years ago

Reports that trace the entry of and changes to critical data values are called ____ and are essential in every system.

ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

audit trails

Explanation:

Reports that trace the entry of and changes to critical data values are called <u>audit trails</u> and are essential in every system.

8 0

3 years ago

Instructions: Please make sure that you show all your work when solving the problems. Feel free to make any assumptions whenever

My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Explanation:

From the given information:

The current price = $\dfrac{Dividend(D_o) \times (1+ Growth \ rate) }{\text{Cost of capital -Growth rate}}$

$15 = \dfrac{0.50 \times (1+ Growth rate)}{8\%-Growth rate}$

$15 \times (8 -Growth \ rate) = 0.50 +(0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$1.20 - (15 \times Growth \ rate) = 0.50 + (0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$0.70 = (15 \times growth \ rate) \\ \\ Growth \ rate = \dfrac{0.70}{15.50} \\ \\ Growth \ rate = 0.04516 \\ \\ Growth \ rate \simeq 4.52\% \\ \\$

2. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend \ payout \ ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%} \\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+0.04516)}{8\%-0.04516}$

=$75.526

Discount all potential future cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 +Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no\ of\ years} }$

$+ \dfrac{Terminal\ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years}} \Bigg)$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$75.526}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg )$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$75.526}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$ 54.1945

As a result, the analysts value the stock at $54.20, which is below their own estimates.

3. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend payout ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%}\\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763 \\ \\$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)\times dividend \ payout \ ratio}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+ 7 \%) \times 20\%}{8\%-7\%}$

=$53.8773

Discount all potential cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 + Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no \ of\ years} }+ \dfrac{Terminal \ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years }} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg( \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$53.8773}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg (\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$53.8773}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$39.460

As a result, the price is $39.460, and the other strategy would raise the value of the shareholders. Not this one, since paying a 100% dividend would result in a price of $54.20, which is higher than the current price.

Notice that the third question depicts the situation after 5 years, but the final decision will be the same since we are discounting in current terms. If compounding is used, the future value over 5 years is just the same as the first choice, which is the better option.

The presumption in the second portion is that after 5 years, the steady growth rate would be the same as measured in the first part (1).

8 0

3 years ago

Mount Company incurred a total cost of $8,600 to produce 400 units of pulp. Each unit of pulp required 5 direct labor hours to c

Sophie [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is option (B).

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:

Total cost = $8,600

Total units = 400 Units

Direct labor hour per unit = 5

Variable cost = $1.50

So, we can calculate the fixed cost by using following formula:

Fixed cost = Total cost - Total Direct labor cost

Where, Total direct labor cost = $1.50 × 5 × 400 = $3,000

By putting the value in the formula, we get

Fixed cost = $8,600 - $3,000

= $5,600

5 0

3 years ago