<span>14 = GCF of M and 210
M = possible values
GCF = Greatest common denominator
Now, let’s start decomposing
=> 210 | 2
=> 105 | 2
=> 35 | 5
=> 7 | 7
=> 1
Thus, 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 = 210
Now let’s find the factors of 14
=> 14 | 2
=> 7 | 7
=> 1
Thus, 2 x 7 = 14
Notice that’s there’s no 14 in 210 shown factors, but the only GCF found is 7.
Thus, the value of M that we’re looking for is infinite. All numbers that has
the GCF of 7 are applicable.</span>
X = 0 ; y = 10 ; 10 = a(0) + b(0) + c
c = 10
x=2 ; y = 15 ; 15 = a(4) + b(2) + 10 ; 5 = 4a+2b
x=4 ; y=18 ; 18 = a(16) + b(4) + 10 ; 8 = 16a + 4b
2(5) = (4a+2b)2
-
<u> 8 = 16a + 4b
</u> 2 = -8a
a = -0.25
b = 2
y = (1/4)x^2 + 2x + 10 ; 4y = x^2 + 8x + 40
Answer:
i rlly dont want to make you wrong cause i feel lik im wrong but i got all of them as cant be sides of triangles
Step-by-step explanation:
i did use a calculator tho
Would this be the correct answer? If not, can you further explain the question?(11x+8y)(11x-8y)
The events are independent. By definition, it means that knowledge about one event does not help you predict the second, and this is the case: even if you knew that you rolled an even number on the first cube, would you be more or less confident about rolling a six on the second? No.
An example in which two events about rolling cubes are dependent could be something like:
Event A: You roll the first cube
Event B: The second cube returns a higher number than the first one.
In this case, knowledge on event A does change you view on event B (and vice versa): if you know that you rolled a 6 on the first cube you don't want to bet on event B, while if you know that you rolled a 1 on the first cube, you're certain that event B will happen.
Conversely, if you know that event B has happened, you are more likely to think that the first cube rolled a small number, and vice versa.
