Aristotle feels that way because he believed that M<span>ost of the creation could not be studied and therefore lay beyond human understanding.
He believed that some things are meant to be unknown by the limit of our intellectual capabilities and we should only focus on things that we could control with our current capabilities.</span>
If you have an argument that is weak and uncogent, the conclusion may be either true or false.
An argument is a collection of two or more statements, one of which is supported by another. A conclusion is a proposition supported and a premise is a proposition supporting the conclusion. The purpose of an argument is to build a conclusion based on the premises or the evidence provided by the premises.
An inductive argument is one that claims that the conclusion follows with some degree of probability. In other words, premises make the conclusion more likely to be true, and premises true make the conclusion less likely to be false. Inductive arguments are powerful when given that the premises are true, the conclusion is unlikely to be false.
An inductive argument is weak when the conclusion is likely false given the premises are true. A strong argument is cogent if the premise is correct. A strong argument is uncogent if at least one of its premises is wrong.
Know more about uncogent argument here
brainly.com/question/13445406
#SPJ4
The answer would be the bedsheet ballot
A Bedsheet ballot is filled with a lot of information about candidates for voting that is really long and really detailed such as candidates propositions, planing, etc <span />
Answer: Motet.
Explanation:
Musical creation during the Renaissance focused on the nature of vocal parts among which Motet and Madrigal stand out. A fundamental feature of creative endeavour is the pursuit of the importance of the text.
The characteristic of Renaissance music was also the imitation of ancient Greek music with exciting elements. Motet can ultimately be defined as a form of secular and church music.
