1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
love history [14]
3 years ago
10

1. Ken and Tran are good friends. They studied for an accountancy degree together at university. After graduation, they decide

Law
2 answers:
labwork [276]3 years ago
6 0
Yes indeed ms girl you got it
Bond [772]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

there in a partnership so they share the same responsibilities each occurs, good or bad

You might be interested in
Why was Tarana Burke surprised by the Twitter activity on her #MeToo account?​
Nookie1986 [14]
She was surprised because I left the me too
4 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
Another round of bullets hits my skin
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

I won't let them break me down to dust I know that there's a place for us

Explanation:

For we are glorious

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Scenario #4: Juan is driving his sons to school. They are fighting in the
natali 33 [55]

Answer:

Juan

Explanation:

because he killed people just for trying to stop his sons from fighting. All sibilings fight it's a part of life

8 0
2 years ago
How did Franklin Roosevelt try to increase presidential power?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
He tried to increase presidential power by trying to pass government programs to develop the nation’s economy. He also attempted to pack the supreme court in his favor and faield
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Gina is 15 and lives in Oklahoma with her parents and 2 siblings who are fiancially well and no abuse or problems whatsoever. Gi
    9·1 answer
  • Plz hurry idk how to do this :/
    10·1 answer
  • What is the difference between exclusive jurisdiction and concurrent jurisdiction
    15·1 answer
  • Jay is fired from his job and sues his employer. Jay loses the trial, and he appeals. The reviewing court affirms the decision o
    6·1 answer
  • A man was accused of attacking another man. He was brought into police custody and interrogated for 2 hours. Prior to the interr
    12·2 answers
  • 12. The cell of the society<br>is<br>​
    14·2 answers
  • Which is untrue of both state and federal government?
    11·1 answer
  • What is a drawback of a member of Congress voting as a partisan?
    6·1 answer
  • Ms. Bosman writes that the verdict is being seen by some as “a win for the notion of self-defense” and others as “a failure of t
    6·1 answer
  • In your own words, why do we call the Legislative Branch “the branch of you?” Help please
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!