I think that this question was asked by a bot made by brainly.
The truth of life on the frontier was that numerous pioneers traveling westbound needed to get their lives together into wagons and make a long, risky excursion. These pioneers had single out what to carry with them and what to desert on the grounds that there was constrained space on the wagons. Numerous frontierrs likewise needed to live on a similar wagon and figure out how to utilize the space. This change was particularly hard for pioneer ladies since they despite everything needed to bring up their kids, cook, and wash garments without a lot of their gear and family unit machines. These ladies must be versatile and figure out how to do huge numbers of their equivalent tasks while being continually progressing.
The way that frontier ladies needed to forsake the homes they spent their lives making, and adjust their jobs to have the option to do the entirety of very similar things while bridging the nation isn't fundamentally the same as present day life. Going in current America has been made a lot simpler by extravagances, for example, lodgings, autos, and cafés. As a result of these extravagances, no advanced individuals should traverse the nation with the entirety of their effects in a wagon. Moving has additionally been made simpler by organizations that will move your assets for pay. This implies individuals don't have to stress over leaving an amazing majority behind while moving.
Answer: Populism from the Latin word "Populus," which in translation would mean the people.
Explanation:
Similar to the notion of democracy, populism implies a rule that is in the service of the people. It is the opposite of government, which includes in its interest group a small group of people whose interests are defended, which is the case with aristocracy and plutocracy. And if they are similar synonyms, democracy today implies positive connotations in public, while populism is taken in the context of the negative.
This is because the strategy of populism is based on using the sensibilities of society, their essential life issues for political purposes. For example, it is possible to take two groups, which are separated by different antagonisms. On the one hand, it is an ordinary people and on the other a corrupt elite who argue that politics should be an expression of the will of the people
Answer:
Explanation:
According to all the movies made on the subject including documentaries, the war in the Pacific had less attention paid to it than the European (read German) theater.
And yet for America, the fighting in the Pacific was probably much more brutal and primitive than Europe.
But that can't stated categorically. Europe was mainly a conflict between the Soviet Union and Germany. Some of the worst battles (for both sides) were fought on Russian Soil. You could look up Stalingrad, Leningrad and Kursk. These three battles were among the bloodiest (if not the bloodiest) in all recorded history.
So I guess it depends on which historian you ask.
You likely will do all right if you answer Germany, but it was not nearly that simple.
