Answer:
1. No match.
2. Rebate.
3. No match.
4. No match.
5. Lease.
Explanation:
1. No match: This is the worth of the leased asset after the lease period expires.
- The worth of the leased asset after the lease period expires is known as Residual value.
2. Rebate: This is a partial refund offered to attract the buyer to purchase the vehicle.
3. No match: This is the price of an asset being leased as specified in the lease agreement, which includes the negotiated cost of the vehicle and any applicable fees and taxes.
- Capitalized cost refers to the price of an asset being leased as specified in the lease agreement, which includes the negotiated cost of the vehicle and any applicable fees and taxes.
4. No match: This is the advertised retail price listed on a particular vehicle for sale.
- Sticker price is the advertised retail price listed on a particular vehicle for sale.
5. Lease: This is a contract which allows the lessee (consumer) to use the asset, such as car, land, services etc., in return for a specific amount paid periodically.
The minimum price that this order could be offered is at cost. Since there are no cost figures in this question, this is the best answer I can give.
You would need to at least sell the item for the amount of money it cost you to make, assemble, and ship the product.
Answer:
$46,000
Explanation:
We can find out the the revaluation gain that need to be reported at the year end by just deducting the the cost of the investment by its current fair value .
DATA
Fair value = 588,000
Cost = 542,000
Revaluation gain = Current fair value - Cost
Revaluation gain = 588,000 - 542,000
Revaluation gain = $46,000
The revaluation gain of $46,000 will be reported in other compreensive income of smith's financial statements.
Answer:
The firm should pay $46907.57 for the given project.
Explanation:
Given information:
Return = $15000 annually
Time = 5 years
Opportunity cost = 18%
The formula for payment is
where, R is return, OC is opportunity cost, t is time in years.
Substitute R=15000, t=5 and OC=0.18 in the above formula.
Therefore the firm should pay $46907.57 for the given project.
