Answer:
Duress/Coercion/Compulsion
Explanation:
Duress or Coercion or Compulsion: This type of defense involves someone else threatening to use force or violence to get you to do something against your better judgment. Essentially, it means you were forced to commit a crime. In this case, Reuben want to entangle the elderly lady into the crime of bank heist by threatening to shoot her husband.
For a defense of Duress/Coercion/Compulsion: the person must be forced to commit the offence. The person under duress (illegal coercion usually through being threatened or the use of violence) must be present when the offence is committed. The person must believe that the threat will be carried out.
Answer:
Gross profit= $54,700
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchases $37,000
Merchandise inventory, September 1 6,100
Merchandise inventory, September 30 6,800
Sales 91,000
<u>First, we need to calculate the cost of goods sold:</u>
COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods purchased - ending finished inventory
COGS= 6,100 + 37,000 - 6,800
COGS= $36,300
<u>Now, the gross profit:</u>
Gross profit= sales - COGS
Gross profit= 91,000 - 36,300
Gross profit= $54,700
Answer:
$2 per unit per year
Explanation:
The calculation of the inventory carrying cost per unit per year is shown below:
Inventory Carrying cost per unit per year is
= Total Annual Inventory cost ÷ Economic order quantity
= $400 ÷ 200 units
= $2 per unit per year
It is computed By dividing the total annual inventory cost from the economic order quantity, in order to get the inventory carrying cost
Therefore, the first option is correct
The multiplier applies to the investment, net exports and government spending.
<h3>What is a
multiplier?</h3>
This refers to an economic factor that of increased, it can causes an increases in many other related economic variables.
Hence, in economics, its applies to the investment, net exports and government spending.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about multiplier
<em>brainly.com/question/19549086</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
The dean has violated the brights of other members to be picked for the violation through this act of favoritism.
Explanation:
This dean has gone ahead to rewrite David's description. By so doing he has altered the job description to favor david. This shows a bias to David in the side of this dean thereby causing him to violate the act that says that there should be no discrimination or bias of my form.
Rewriting the job description to favor david is against the ethics of the distributive justice framework which says that the distribution of goods in a society must be done In an equitable manner for all. 2 principles of this are applicable here. The rights based justice and also the legal justice. Rights based justice demands that the rights of people bare respected which the dean has clearly also violated.
