Answer:
One of the most powerful bankers of his era, J.P. (John Pierpont) Morgan (1837-1913) financed railroads and helped organize U.S. Steel, General Electric and other major corporations. ... However, he faced criticism that he had too much power and was accused of manipulating the nation's financial system for his own gain.
The main reason why the building of canals slowed in the 1830s and 1840s was because "Railroads started in America at this time" and the five ways in which the South was affected would be "Slaves became more important and valuable" "Land under production declined" "Southern attitudes about slavery hardened" "Cotton became the principal southern crop" and "<span>Cotton became a major U.S. export", since there was never a Caste system in the South. </span>
1 Sir Frances Bernard- Loyalist
2 Thomas Whatley- Loyalist
3 William pit- Patriot
4 Thomas Paine- Patriot
5 Thomas Jefferson- Patriot
6 Joseph Brant- Loyalist
7 Samuel Adams- Loyalist
8 Mercy Ottis Warren- Patriot
9 Patrick Henry- Patriot
10 Thomas hutchingson- Loyalist
-BBBM
The correct answer is A. Supported of slavery insisted It was moral because it was practiced in biblical times, while abolitionists argued that it was immoral because God created all people in His Image.
Explanation:
Slavery was a common practice during the 1800s in the Southern states that depended on it due to its economic model based on agriculture; at the same time, this practice was strongly opposed by the northern states that had an industrialized economic model. These opposite points of view about slavery were supported through different arguments including moral arguments that focused on whether slavery was ethical or "correct".
About this, people in the south and general supporters of slavery promoted the idea slavery was moral because it was a common practice during the history and was even part of the bible, which they consider as the law of God. On the opposite, abolitionists stated God had created all people as equal because everyone including slaves were made in His Image.
Answer:
The costs of passing a bill that prohibits child labor is precisely that all the labor that children could have provided for the economy is forgone. So in pure economic terms, there is a loss of value, a sunk cost.
However, the benefit is both economic, and social. The economic benefit is that children will instead go to school, and educate themselves to become more productive workers in the future. And the social benefit is a fairer society, and wealthier too.
