Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: A. <span> Correlation
There is nothing that mentioned the development of henry Bessemer's invention was made impossible only because of Abraham darby's invention.
Becaus of this, both inventions are only correlated with one another since they do not form a cause and effect relationship.</span>
Answer:
d. to protect against radical shifts in government that result from swift changes in popular opinion
Explanation:
The senate serves to "mediate" and reach proper agreements based on well thought out and thorough proceedings from a handful representative of the people. It works to protect against swift, radical changes in government as it checks and balances other government loopholes that could push for radical changes that may be harmful to the system.
Answer:
individuals, cultures, and societies
Explanation: These are main and important parts of history.
Answer:
The Athenian boys had the chance to learn literature and play instruments such as the lyre Athens was the first city to have a government. Disadvantages Only the men in the Athens had a say about government. Only the Rich women of Athens got an education, not the poor ones.
Explanation:
