1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
coldgirl [10]
3 years ago
5

What are the pros and cons of higher speed driving on an expressway?

History
2 answers:
zzz [600]3 years ago
8 0

pros - getting to destination faster




con- might get into accident

can get a ticket

LenKa [72]3 years ago
6 0

In the following ways, the pros and cons of higher speed driving on an expressway:

Pros:

1. You may reach your destination more quickly.

2. The chances of accidents are very low.

3. It saves fuel.

Cons:

1. Longtime driving can affect drivers.

2. The lack of focus can cause drastic accidents.

You might be interested in
For what crime did the house judiciary committee vote to charge president nixon as one of the grounds for impeachment
CaHeK987 [17]
Obstruction of Justice I believe.
6 0
3 years ago
What is the next step in the legislative process after a committee has reported a measure to the senate?
shepuryov [24]

A congressional debate takes place and members vote on the measure.

Explanation:

The legislative process is the process used to create laws, in the United States, bills are sponsored by a Representative, then the bill passes to a committee to analyze it and then it is voted, if the bill passes <em>it goes to the senate, where a congressional debate takes place and members vote on the measure</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did sir walter ralegh discover the roanoke islands
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

he discovered it by writing the lighting the lamp.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
In which decade did the number of women employed in manufacturing increase most?
abruzzese [7]
I assume the 30s and 40s during WWII. The men were drafted to war so the women took their jobs.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the british able to conquer india?
melisa1 [442]
There are a good number of reasons why the British were able to do so, and in fact rule over India effectively for over a century.

Disunity among Indian princely states. India was more a collection of warring princely states, at loggerheads with each other. The British sucessfully used this to play off one state against another. Add to it there was no dearth of people willing to betray the kingdom for a few pieces of silver. Robert Clive succeeded at Plassey, because Mir Jaffar was willing to betray his master Siraj-Ud-Daulah in lie of being the Nawab. Mir Jaffar himself was betrayed by Mir Qasim later on.Tipu Sultan one of the most redoubtable fighters against the British rule, was finally defeated, as the Marathas, King of Mysore, Nizam of Hyderabad all joined hands with the British.
Superiority over other colonial powers. The other colonial powers in India competing for the share of resources were France,Portugal,Denmark, Holland. Of the 4, Denmark and Holland could never really be serious competitors to the British, they had their own trading posts, scattered around, but were never a serious threat. Portugal focussed primarily on the Western coast, Goa, parts of Kerala, Karnataka, and this left the British with vast swathes of unoccupied territory. That left France as the major contender to Britian in the race for colonialism. The British Army was more well equipped, more professional, more disciplined compared to the French army, suffering from indiscipline and corruption. This made the British win key battles all over the East Coast, as they effectively grabbed control.
Doctrine of Lapse. One of the most effective tactics, the British used to take over most of India. Instead of waging an all out war against some of the princely states, they signed a treaty with them, where in if the ruling king died without a heir, the East India company could take over that. And that is how Satara became one of the first states to end up under British rule. And that was also the main reason for the conflict in Jhansi.
Subsidiary alliance was also an effective instrument. According to this alliance, the kingdom which signs the treaty will have to maintain the following rules:

The British agreed to maintain a permanent and fixed subsidiary force within the territory of their ally.
In return, they didn't take money but took over a part of the territory of the ally.
A British officer called "resident" was placed at the court of the ruler.{he could interfere in the internal matters of the kingdom}
The ally could not maintain any relation with any other ruler without the approval of the British.{so,when the rulers wanted to revolt against the British they are alone.}
The Indian rulers felt a false sense of security but in reality they were losing their independence. On the other hand the Britishers maintained large forces at the expenses of the Indian rulers and also increase their area of influence. Some states brought under control through this policy are Hyderabad, Tanjore, Awadh, etc.
At the end of it all, the British had the advantage of better manpower, were militarily more powerful and stronger, and add to it they had some very canny strategists too. And the disunity among Indian princely states, their constant warring with each other, just added to the advantage.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the 1990s, many isolated individuals began to see the growth of federal prison populations as a problem. later they would for
    14·1 answer
  • In 1956 , what country tried to break free of Soviet control​
    12·1 answer
  • What word is used in jamestown to describe men who had money and power?
    12·1 answer
  • Simplify completely.<br><br> (W^15/W^5)^4
    11·2 answers
  • The men writing the Constitution made progress after they:
    6·1 answer
  • How did communist gain control of china?
    6·2 answers
  • There should be no Gun Laws at all cause we have the right to bear arms now whos with me!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • ENGLISH**** (oops)
    5·1 answer
  • Which two US territories are closest to the continental United States?
    15·2 answers
  • In the years following the Civil War, leaders of some American businesses attempted to bribe Treasury Department officials in
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!