The mere existence of natural resources in a country does not contribute to economic progress unless some conditions prevail.sta
te the condition
1 answer:
Answer:
ᴀꜱ ᴡᴀʀᴍ ᴀꜱ ꜱᴜɴ
ᴀꜱ ꜱɪʟʟʏ ᴀꜱ ꜰᴜɴ
ᴀꜱ ᴄᴏʟᴅ ❄️ ᴀꜱ ᴀ ᴛʀᴇᴇ
ᴀꜱ ꜱᴄᴀʀʏ ᴀꜱ ꜱᴇᴀ
ᴀꜱ ʜᴏᴛ ᴀꜱ ꜰɪʀᴇ
ᴀꜱ ᴄᴏʟᴅ ᴀꜱ ɪᴄᴇ
ꜱᴡᴇᴇᴛ ᴀꜱ ꜱᴜɢᴀʀ
ᴀɴᴅ ᴇᴠᴇʀʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ɴɪᴄᴇ
ᴀꜱ ᴏʟᴅ ᴀꜱ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ⌛
ᴀꜱ ꜱᴛʀᴀɪɢʜᴛ ᴀꜱ ʟɪɴᴇ ➖
ᴀꜱ ʀᴏʏᴀʟ ᴀꜱ ᴀ ᴀɴɢᴇʟ☺️
ᴀꜱ ʙᴜᴢᴢᴇᴅ ᴀꜱ ʙᴇᴇ
ᴀꜱ ꜱᴛᴇᴀʟᴛʜ ᴀꜱ ᴛɪɢᴇʀ
ꜱᴍᴏᴏᴛʜ ᴀꜱ ɢʟɪᴅᴇʀ
ᴘᴜʀᴇ ᴀꜱ ʜᴇᴀʀᴛ ❤️
ᴘᴜʀᴇ ᴀꜱ ɪ ᴡᴀɴɴᴀ ʙᴇ
Explanation:
<h2>Xxxxxxxxxd</h2>
You might be interested in
1. Because only 25% of the foreign investment went from MDCs to LDCs.
2. Money is not invested evenly among LDCs (most money went to China).
The cost of adding more options. Supply and demand: would the students want to have salad for lunch, or would it go to waste?
I think it’s 3 and 4 as the answer.
