Answer:
The net present value (NPV) is the most important and useful method of capital budgeting analysis. It is basically calculated by determining the present value of all the future cash flows generated by a project and then subtract the original investment cost. If the answer is positive (positive NPV) then the project should be profitable and the company should go ahead with it. The limitation of NPV results from the discount rate used to calculate the present value, since it is extremely important to use the proper discount rate and not one that is too low or too high.
The second most useful tool is the internal rate of return (IRR) which is very related to the NPV. The IRR shows us basically at what discount rate the NPV would equal 0. Generally if the IRR is higher than the discount rate the NPV should be positive.
The payback period shows us how much time it takes a project to recover the original amount of money invested in it. The payback period is only useful for some industries where early obsolescence might be a problem. E.g. technological firms only approve projects with very short payback periods because their products might be obsolete in just one or two years.
Answer:
7.6 percent
Explanation:
Vaughn should offer 7.6 percent on its commercial paper.
This is calculated by adding the 0.2 credit risk premium to 0.1 percent liquidity premium + 0.3 percent tax adjustment + 7 percent annualized t bills rate.
= 0.1 + 0.2 + 0.3 + 7
= 7.6
Based on this Vaughn would offer 7.6 percent on its commercial paper.
ANSWER:
Upon admission to the inpatient setting.
STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:
An inpatient admission is generally appropriate when you're expected to need 2 or more midnights of medically necessary hospital care, but your doctor must order such admission and the hospital must formally admit you in order for you to become an inpatient.
If the long-run average total cost curve for a firm is horizontal in a relevant range of production, then it indicates that there (B) are constant returns to scale.
<h3>
What is the long-run average total cost curve?</h3>
- The long-run average cost (LRAC) curve depicts the firm's lowest cost per unit at each output level, assuming that all production parameters are changeable.
- The LRAC curve presupposes that the firm has determined the best factor mix for creating any amount of production, as discussed in the previous section.
- To derive the long-run total cost function, we take the expansion path's total cost and quantity pairs.
- "When all factors of production are variable, the long-run total cost function displays the lowest total cost of generating each amount."
- If a firm's long-run average total cost curve is horizontal in a relevant production range, it shows that there are consistent returns to scale.
As the description states, if a firm's long-run average total cost curve is horizontal in a relevant production range, it shows that there are consistent returns to scale.
Therefore, if the long-run average total cost curve for a firm is horizontal in a relevant range of production, then it indicates that there (B) are constant returns to scale.
Know more about the long-run average total cost curve here:
brainly.com/question/10205972
#SPJ4
Complete question:
If the long-run average total cost curve for a firm is horizontal in a relevant range of production, then it indicates that there
A. isn't a minimum efficiency scale.
B. are constant returns to scale.
C. are diseconomies of scale.
D. are economies of scale.
Answer:
D. The Nash equilibrium is for Firm 1 and Firm 2 each to produce 10.
Explanation:
Firm 2
10 units 20 units
10 units 30 / 50 /
Firm 1 30 35
20 units 40 / 20 /
60 20
(firm 1 /
firm 2)
Firm 1's dominant strategy would be to sell 10 units with an expected payoff outcome = 30 + 50 = 80
Firm 2's dominant strategy would be to sell 10 units with an expected payoff outcome = 30 + 60 = 90
Since both firms have the same dominant strategy (to produce 10 units), there is a Nash Equilibrium where both firms produce 10 units and each one earns 30.
