The eco-nomy was in long-run equilibrium when aggre-gate demand increased. At this point in time, the expec-ted inflation has start-ed to adjust to the new high-er actual inflation rate. Accor-ding to the (Friedman) natural rate the-ory, this means the unemploy-ment rate in the economy must curr-ently be <u><em>below the natu-ral rate</em></u>.
Milton Friedman defi-ned the natural rate of unemploy-ment as the level of unemployment that result-ed from real economic forces, the long-run level of whi-ch could not be altered by monet-ary policy. Accor-ding to the general equili-brium model of economics, natural unemploy-ment is equal to the level of unemploy-ment of a labor mark-et at perfect equilibrium.
To know more about Friedman click below:
brainly.com/question/6803976
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>Cost Of Goods Manufactured $ 133,000</u>
Explanation:
Peterson Company
Schedule for the cost of goods manufactured
For 2017
Direct Materials (opening Inventory) 21,000
Add Purchases 74,000
<u>Less Ending Inventory (23000)</u>
Materials available for Use 72,000
Add Direct Labor 22,000
Factory Overhead
Indirect Manufacturing Labor 17,000
Plant Insurance 7,000
Depreciation 11,000
<u>Repairs 3000 38,000</u>
132,000
Add Opening WIP 26,000
<u>Less Closing WIP 25,000</u>
<u>Cost Of Goods Manufactured $ 133,000</u>
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The sentence is too long and it is missing proper punctuations(like a comma). Reading it without punctuation does not provide room for breathing and therefore needs editing. It will be correct if framed like this; Although you may not have received the e-mail, we have been informed that the division head of the Finance Department is leaving at the end of the month. This sentence has a comma in the right place.
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
<span>The customs of a bride taking her husband's last name and her family paying for the wedding represents a patriarchal line of authority. In a patriarchal line of authority, the man is considered the head of a family and descendants trace their heritage back through his line.</span>
