1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
3 years ago
9

In what ways do civil liberties limit the scope of government

History
1 answer:
muminat3 years ago
8 0
Civil Liberties, like those found in our Bill of Rights, limit the powers the government can hold (mostly to keep leaders from becoming oppressive or tyrannical). They cannot limit your freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion, and things like that. 
You might be interested in
Money that you earn from working or gain from investments. income credit budget savings account
Klio2033 [76]
The answer is income i think
7 0
3 years ago
Franklin D. Roosevelt was first elected president as the Depression peaked in 1929. 1932. 1936. 1939.
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

1932

Explanation: Hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The federal reserve system was created to
Tamiku [17]
The federal reserve is the central banking. it was created to protect the money (i think)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME
svetoff [14.1K]

<u>Answer:</u>

It created the process for admitting states and expanding the country.

Option: (C)

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • The northwest ordinance is considered as one of the important laws in American history because of the fact that it describes how a state would be admitted.
  • Moreover, it also clearly defines the areas like how a newly admitted state would get its equal status in the union and how the civil liberties and equity would be provided to those states.
  • Due to this law, the expansion of the country was well defined and a systemic and legal process was set for this process.
5 0
3 years ago
4 reasons why people opposed the constitution
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • one way in which the kentucky and virginia resolutions and the south carolina ordinance of nullification are similar is that eac
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of John F. Kennedy?
    6·2 answers
  • What slight improvement does lady macbeth make in the plan for the murder?
    15·1 answer
  • What Does Parris Mean When He Says “ I Cannot Blink What I Saw “ ?
    10·1 answer
  • Compare the policies pursued by Japanese Liberals to those followed by Japanese conservatives during the 1920s and 1930s?
    7·1 answer
  • Who was Hitler's command and what was hiso?
    5·1 answer
  • What type of wave is shown above?
    5·2 answers
  • Ngày 10 tháng 10 năm 1945 là ngày gì
    6·1 answer
  • Approximately what year did the Ice Age end?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the diagram?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!