1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lawyer [7]
3 years ago
9

Please helppp!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

English
1 answer:
Lana71 [14]3 years ago
5 0
Washing the fruit first
You might be interested in
In this acceptance speech for Nobel Peace Prize, how does Albert Schweitzer convince the audience of his position of peace?
vodka [1.7K]

This question is not complete and this is the complete version i found.

Let us dare to face the situation. Man has become superman. He is a superman because he not only has at his disposal innate physical forces, but also commands, thanks to scientific and technological advances, the latent forces of nature which he can now put to his own use. To kill at a distance, man used to rely solely on his own physical strength; he used it to bend the bow and to release the arrow. The superman has progressed to the stage where, thanks to a device designed for the purpose, he can use the energy released by the combustion of a given combination of chemical products. This enables him to employ a much more effective projectile and to propel it over far greater distances.

However, the superman suffers from a fatal flaw. He has failed to rise to the level of superhuman reason which should match that of his superhuman strength. He requires such reason to put this vast power to solely reasonable and useful ends and not to destructive and murderous ones. Because he lacks it, the conquests of science and technology become a mortal danger to him rather than a blessing.

In this context is it not significant that the first great scientific discovery, the harnessing of the force resulting from the combustion of gunpowder, was seen at first only as a means of killing at a distance?

Select the correct answer.

In this acceptance speech for Nobel Peace Prize, how does Albert Schweitzer convince the audience of his position of peace?

A.

repeating the metaphor of gunpowder

B.

using his expert testimony on peace

C.

generalizing the flaws of science

D.

comparing the human to a superman

Answer:

D.  comparing the human to a superman

Explanation:

Albert Schweitzer tries to convince the audience of his position of peace by comparing the human to a superman in order to show how man thinks of himself as super powerful because of simple technological and scientific discoveries.

He first starts by recognizing how the advances in technology has greatly enhanced the strength of man and how man can do more and perform more accurately with less effort than before. He then goes on to add that such superhuman strength requires superhuman reason so it will not become a curse.

According to him, without superhuman reason, man will continue to use such advances in technology for harm and wars and killings instead of for reasonable and useful ends.

5 0
3 years ago
He said to me tell me your name (change into indirect speech)​
erica [24]

Answer:

He said that you should tell me your name.

4 0
3 years ago
An argument is .... based on emotion. based on anger. based on logic. based on fiction.
Sholpan [36]
An argument is based on logic

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The rhythm and the flow of the language
____ [38]

Answer:

The rhythm and flow of language is important in all types of writing, including scientific writing. If your language has a consistent rhythm and flow, chances are your reader will be more likely to understand it on a first read.

5 0
3 years ago
How does author Mackenzie Carro characterize the 1950s and '60s era
Masja [62]

Hello. You did not enter the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.

To characterize the times of the 50s and 60s, the author must have used a series of adjectives that not only show the characteristics of that time but also reinforce the similarities and differences between them. In this case, we can say that the author characterizes these two epochs through a descriptive language that presents these two epochs in a specific and punctual way.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Astrology is the belief that the positioning of the stars and planets affect the way events occur on earth. Why is astrology not
    10·2 answers
  • [50 PTS]
    14·2 answers
  • What is one important element of Romantic literature
    15·1 answer
  • A(n) _____ is a narrator who knows everything about the characters and relates these facts throughout the story.
    13·2 answers
  • Select all that apply.
    12·2 answers
  • Which sentence from the passage BEST explains why Thoreau<br>chose to live in the woods?​
    6·1 answer
  • Where are the fifty states?<br>​
    9·2 answers
  • How does Macbeth feel about the witches' prediction?
    11·1 answer
  • When one factor is said to influence another factor, we refer to this as:?
    10·1 answer
  • A period in MLA citation format indicates a complete stop and a tranfer to a new type of
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!