Answer:
B) False
Explanation:
The chicken tactic is a combination of a huge deceit or bluff about what you really want or need, and a threat to do something usually not very normal or rational. The whole idea is to try to force the other negotiating party to chicken out and surrender to your requests. Both a chicken tactic and a hardball tactic are designed to take advantage of the other party.
The problem with using a chicken tactic is what happens if the other side calls the bluff, will the threat be real or not, and what position will the other side hold. For example, an employer negotiating wage increases with a union, if the employer threats to close the factory and the other party tells him/her to go on and close it, what will be the result. This type of negotiating tactic can result in huge problems.
Answer:
Answer is given in the explanation
Explanation:
1. Racial predisposition; this research violates very basic ethical code of racial discrimination. There is no way that a researcher can be allowed to target a specific group of people based on their biological race. This type of discrimination hinders the authenticity of research and have far reaching repercussions for the target group as well as the whole society.
2. Electroshock therapy; this research’s target population is preteens and adolescents, experimenting such an extreme punishment on them has no justification. This causes direct harm to the children. Besides the electroshock are used on chronic psychic patients not on general public not even adults let alone the preteens.
3. Health Problems, Diet, and Socioeconomic Status; this research proposal is better than the previous two proposals but it has some ethical regarding the consequences of the publicly published findings. Rather it would be more effective to keep these findings to the policy makers and work for the betterment of the lower status peoples so that they can also eat healthy diet.
Answer:
$80 billion
Explanation:
Okun law equation: GDP gap = Actual GDP * ((Unemployment rate - Natural rate)/100)*2)
GDP gap = $4,000 * ((6-5)/100*2)
GDP gap = $4,000 * 0.02
GDP gap = $80 billion
Therefore, $80 billion in an output level thus, would be what the economy would have sacrificed.
Answer:
a. No impairment should be reported
Explanation:
In the given situation, we compare the expected future net cash flows and the higher value of book value and fair value.
The comparison is shown below
Since the expected future net cash flows from the equipment i.e $1,630,000 is more than the book value of equipment $1,600,000. The value comes in negative
So, no impairment loss would be recognized
Answer:
C. A price reduction that a producer gives to resellers to encourage
them to promote products
Explanation:
bcuz that's what advertising allowance is
