Work of Shakespeare can be used to influence the people about the cultue and values of their time.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Author proposed that Shakespeare was a superior poem author than dramatist. They stress how his pieces and plays were all the more speaking to crowds from his time."Shakespeare isn't of an age, yet forever."
He lives today in our language, our way of life and society – and through his suffering impact on instruction. Shakespeare assumed a basic job in molding present day English and assisting with making it the world's language.
E
The answer is E because every website is a source for you research topic.
(When you do a research project make sure to use all the information you have!)
Answer:
A. deferential
Explanation:
<em>He was an important dignitary and was, thus, given </em><u><em>deferential </em></u><em>treatment.</em>
option a. best completes the sentence. to be deferential is to be respectful. so this would mean, the "important dignitary" was treated with respect.
<span>General Barker bustled about the house like a woman preparing Thanksgiving dinner for twenty.
This is the best example of irony. The excerpt describes General Barker, who occupies a traditionally very masculine profession, preparing for the demonstration of the most destructive weapon in the history of mankind as if he were a woman bustling about the house preparing Thanksgiving dinner. This juxtaposition creates a sense of irony. </span>
Answer:
Outline:
- What is freedom of expression.
- The problems of limiting that freedom.
- The need to know how to differentiate between freedom of expression and oppression and intolerance.
- Conclusion.
Explanation:
Freedom of expression is the permission of people to speak their opinions and to position themselves on other people's opinions without suffering any reprisals from anyone. Freedom of expression is a right defended by the first constitutional amendment, in addition to being a humanitarian right that must be respected by all.
Limiting or punishing freedom of expression, therefore, is a negative thing, as it limits the population of the truth, in addition to limiting rationality, questioning and the ability of human beings to think for themselves and show their thoughts. In this case, the punishment of freedom of expression is something tyrannical and should not be promoted in any case and at any time, regardless of what it is.
However, for the population to have free freedom of expression, it is necessary that first, the population knows how to differentiate what is freedom of expression and what is oppression and intolerance. This is because many people use the right to freedom of expression to offend, be prejudiced and hide the hatred of population groups. This is harmful and does not add anything good in the world.
Therefore, we can conclude that punishing freedom of expression is negative for the population, however, it is important that the population is taught about what is opinion and what is hate speech and intolerance.
