The first alternative is correct (A).
England has created a Colonial Pact with its colonies, with the reason of explores them to the maximum. According to the Colonial Pact, the colonies could only buy manufactures from England, so that it had complete freedom to impose the tariffs it pleased for the entry and exit of goods. In this context, England sought raw materials in the colonies at low cost and produced the manufactures that were sold in the colonies at high tariff prices.
It supported dictatorship to avoid conflict giving hitler backing to his campaign
They weren't so successful at conquering Europe or China. Of course, one can blame the long supply lines, but in these cases their adversaries were also determined to repulse them.
In contrast, Byzantium and Persia were exhausted from mutual warfare. Tribes related by kinship to Muslim Arabs had served as mercenaries during this period, so there was a lot of tactical knowledge available.
The Byzantines retreated to the highlands of Anatolia upon losing their lower-lying provinces to the Muslims. I am not sure if they launched a determined counter-attack. The Persians did, but they could not fight coherently.
The whom did the nobles give some of their lands?
To Vassals
The answer to this question is:
Who led the expedition in search of the Northwest passage for the French<span>✔️</span><span>"Giovanni Da Verrazzano"
</span>
Hoped This Helped, <span>
Josjohnson105
Your Welcome :) </span>