All categories

2 years ago

What is the perimeter of the figure displayed?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Lubov Fominskaja [6]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the perimeter of a figure, all we have to do is add up the lengths of its sides. Therefore, the perimeter of this figure is:

$x+x+1+x-4+x+3+x-2\\= (x+x+x+x+x)+(1-4+3-2)\\=5x-2$

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in

What is the probability of choosing a king in a deck of 52 cards?

nikklg [1K]

K) = 4/51 since there are four aces in the deck but only 51 cards left after the king has been removed. WITH REPLACEMENT: Find the probability of drawing three queens in a row, with replacement. We pick a card, write down what it is, then put it back in the deck and draw again.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Identify the vertex of y = x2 + 4x + 5.

Xelga [282]

ANSWER

The vertex is (-2,1)

EXPLANATION

We want to find the vertex of

$y = {x}^{2} + 4x + 5$

We complete the square to obtain,

$y = {x}^{2} + 4x + {(2})^{2} - {(2})^{2} + 5$

The first three terms forms a perfect square trinomial.

$y = {(x + 2})^{2} - 4 + 5$

The vertex form is

$y = {(x + 2})^{2} + 1$

This equation is in the form;

$y = a{(x -h})^{2} + k$

where (h,k)=(-2,1) is the vertex.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help i really need it

Naya [18.7K]

Answer:

Oliver's living expenses- 520(.1)=$52

3 0

2 years ago

Plisss help on my assesment

Anon25 [30]

Answer:

The first one is equivalent [the 6x+48 = 2(3x+24)] and the second one is NOT equivalent [the 7x+21 ≠ 2(5x+3)]

Step-by-step explanation:

Just follow distributive property to solve these. You can ignore the first expression in both until you have to compare the answers.

1. 6x+48 and 2(3x+24)

2(3x+24) ---> 2(3x) + 2(24) ---> 6x + 48

Bring in the first expression ~ 6x+48 and 6x+48

They are the same, so they are equivalent

2. 7x+21 and 2(5x+3)

2(5x+3) ---> 2(5x) + 2(3) ----> 10x + 6

Bring in the first expression ~ 7x+21 and 10x + 6

They are NOT the same, so they are NOT equivalent

6 0

2 years ago

Looking at the repayment time of peer to peer users how would you assume it compares to that every payment via cash or check? wh

Rina8888 [55]

Peer-to-peer is good for fast payment but is lacking in the transfer of funds security as there is mostly made b/w people with one unknown history or background, most people meeting for the first time, Compared to cash or check which is handled physically. This is further explained below.

<h3>Looking at the repayment time of peer-to-peer users how would you assume it compares to that every payment via cash or check?</h3>

Generally, P2P, which stands for peer-to-peer, is a method of payment that enables users to make purchases without needing to have access to their financial institution's account information. The transfer is completed quickly and, in most cases, at no cost. There is a generational divide in terms of adoption, but the vast majority of Americans today make use of mobile payment applications.

In conclusion, Peer-to-peer transactions are typically conducted between people who do not know each other's histories or backgrounds, and the majority of transactions involve people who are meeting for the first time. This makes peer-to-peer transactions less secure than cash or checks, which are physically handled. Peer-to-peer transactions are useful for making payments quickly.