Abused people respond well to love, but they usually don't believe it's real. They wonder why they aren't being hurt or why there is no pain in their love. If they are in a relationship with someone who abuses them, and they never got help as a child, they will continue to be abused and hurt. If they did get help as a child, they will, most likely, walk out of the relationship. On the other hand, people who had good childhoods will respond 'normally' to love, getting out of bad relationships, and staying in good ones.
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is C.
The first quote talks about how people won’t realise what they have until it’s gone, as suggested by “some day you wil love me, but I won’t love you” The repetition of “some day“ shows that the narrator has no clue of when this will happen but is certain that it will at some point.
The second quotation has a similar theme to the previous quote in which the subject of the quote didn’t realise what they had until it was gone or in this specific case the narrator “moved on” The use of emotive language “cared” “hurt and “cried’ makes the reader seem sympathetic for the narrator and is to some extent character development on both the subject and the narrator.
The third quote is slightly different. This quotation talks about sensory language and how you can stop yourself from seeing things but you can’t force your heart to not feel. ”close your heart to the things you don’t want to feel” is used to affect the readers emotions and make them understand the narrators thoughts.
Hope this helps!
In order to have more effective transition, what this student would have to do would be: Paragraph 3 needs to begin with more information about how bread is made.
<h3>What is this story about?</h3>
This was about the invention of the snacks donut. The story tells of the marine who invented it.
A good way to make the transition in the story would be the second to the third paragraph can be done by adding more information on how the bread is made.
Read more on the story here: brainly.com/question/23531372
Hello. You forgot to show the answer options. The options are:
Other industries became more successful and provided needed jobs.
Most successful business owners refused to assist those in need.
Americans realized that business was not immune to failure and could collapse.
Average Americans became the victims of unethical business owners.
Answer:
Americans realized that business was not immune to failure and could collapse.
Explanation:
With the stock market crash, Americans realized that business was not immune to problems, that they could not provide infinite stability to American citizens, as they were susceptible to unfortunate adversities that could cause a major imbalance at any time. They will understand that it was necessary to invest in diversified things and not to put all faith in a single economic branch, because the economy is something very unstable and delicate.