1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
a_sh-v [17]
3 years ago
5

Product A is normally sold for $9.60 per unit. A special price of $7.20 is offered for the export market. The variable productio

n cost is $5.00 per unit. An additional export tariff of 15% of revenue must be paid for all export products. Assume there is sufficient capacity for the special order.
Required:
A. Prepare a differential analysis dated March 16 on whether to reject (Alternative 1) or accept (Alternative 2) the special order.
B. Should the special order be rejected (Alternative 1) or accepted (Alternative 2)?
2) Product B has revenue of $39,500, variable cost of goods sold of $25,500, variable selling expenses of $16,500, and fixed costs of $15,000, creating a loss from operations of $17,500.
Required:
A. Prepare a differential analysis as of May 9 to determine if Product B should be continued (Alternative 1) or discontinued (Alternative 2), assuming fixed costs are unaffected by the decision.
B. Determine if Product B should be continued (Alternative 1) or discontinued (Alternative 2).
Business
1 answer:
Sophie [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. Differential Analysis dated March 16

                                    Reject            Accept

Sales revenue per unit  $0              $7.20

Variable production cost 0                5.00

Additional export tariff     0                 1.08

Total variable costs          0             $6.08

Net income                    $0                $1.12

B. The special order should be accepted.

2) Product B:

Revenue of $39,500

Variable cost of goods sold of $25,500

Variable selling expenses of $16,500

Fixed costs of $15,000

Operational loss $17,500

Differential Analysis of May 9

                                    Reject            Accept

Sales revenue             $0                $39,500

Variable costs:

Product                        $0                 25,500

Selling                          $0                  16,500

Fixed costs                  $15,000         15,000

Total costs                   $15,000      $57,000

Net loss                       $15,000       $17,500

B) Product B should be discontinued.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Normal selling price per unit of Product A = $9.60

Special order price for the export market = $7.20

Variable production cost = $5.00 per unit

Additional export tariff = $1.08 ($7.20 * 15%)

Total variable production and export costs = $6.08

You might be interested in
Due to a downturn the wage of entry level workers has declined by 10 per cent, as a
lilavasa [31]

The cross elasticity of demand for senior workers is 1.5. Senior workers and entry-level workers are gross complements.

The scale effect dominates in this example.

If the wage of the entry level workers increase, the demand curve would shift to the right.

<h3>What is the crosss price elasticity?</h3>

Cross price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded of good A to changes in price of good B.

Cross price elasticity = 15% / 10 = 1.5

Complement goods are goods or resources that are used together. As a result of the decline in wages, senior workers would be laid off. This means that senior workers and entry level workers work together.

<h3>What is the effect on the demand curve if the wages of entry level workers increase?</h3>

If the wage of the entry level workers increase, the demand for senior workers wouuld increase. This would lead to a shift to the right of the demand curve for senior workers.

To learn more about cross price elasticity, please check: brainly.com/question/26054575

8 0
3 years ago
while the washington family was gone for the weekend, their home was broken into and robbed. manny, a professional boxer who liv
Kisachek [45]

Manny's acts would be a past factor in any lawsuit he filed against Mr. Washington, so Manny would lose. Filipino boxer Manny Pacquiao competed as a professional from 1995 until 2021. regarded as one of the greatest professional boxers ever by boxing historians...

<h3>Where does Manny stand historically?</h3>
  • On ESPN's list of the top boxers, pound-for-pound, over the past 25 years, Pacquiao was placed second in 2016. Pacquiao is ranked by BoxRec as the third-best boxer of all time, pound for pound, and as the best Asian boxer ever.
  • A boxer who has won major world championships in eight different weight divisions is known as an octuple champion. The only boxer in history, Manny Pacquiao, has won twelve major world championships in just eight years.

To learn more about Manny pacquiao refer to:

brainly.com/question/28774013

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
Final Exam
Lyrx [107]
I may be wrong but I believe it was copper that’s why some america coins are still made out of it today
4 0
3 years ago
Which is not true of limits? Select one: a. Are the point where you should stop the negotiation b. Are also called resistance po
Rama09 [41]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "B": They should be ignored in a bidding war.

Explanation:

Negotiations are vital in every aspect. They allow individuals to deal with situations in which parties need from each other but either of them is willing to take the first step to come to an agreement. Negotiations can also be useful out of problematic situations when parties voluntarily want to make a pact but the initial terms are unclear.

Placing limits for negotiations is important as well. Limits will prevent parties from giving to much of themselves or avoiding the other party to take advantage of a given situation. Thus, in front of war, limits must be placed in a negotiation.

7 0
4 years ago
A company has the opportunity to take over a redevelopment project in an industrial area of a city. No immediate investment is r
Ganezh [65]

Answer:

1-a. The are multiple IRRs stated as follows:

The first IRR value = 4.09%

Second IRR value = 31.82%

1-b. Rate of return = 7.58%

2. This is NOT a good investment because the NPV is negative.

Explanation:

Note: The estimated Net Cash Flow for the 4th year in the data is erroneously stated in the question as a positive value instead as a negative value since it is a cost.

The estimated net cash flows correctly before answering the question as follows:

Year End             Net Cash Flow

1                             $500,000

2                            $300,000

3                            $100,000

4                          –$2,400,000

5                            $150,000

6                            $200,000

7                            $250,000

8                            $300,000

9                            $350,000

10                           $400,000

The explanation of the answers is now given as follows:

1-a. Tabulate the PW versus the interest rate and determine whether multiple IRRs exist.

Note: See Part 1-a of the attached excel file for the tabulation of the PW versus the interest rate.

From Part 1-a of the attached excel file, it can be observed that multiple IRRs exist. This is because there two IRRs stated as follows:

The first IRR value = 4.09%

Second IRR value = 31.82%

1-b. If so, use the ERR method when e 8% per year to determine a rate of return.

Note: See Part 1-a of the attached excel file for the calculation of total future value of income when e = 8% per year.

In the attached excel file, note that year 4 has a cost not income. Therefore,

From attached excel, we have:

Total Future Value of Income = $3,661,508.81

In the attached excel file, note that year 4 has a cost (not income) of $2,400,000. Therefore, it future value is not calculated. However, the present of the cost can be calculated as follows:

Present value of cost in year 4 = $2,400,000 / (100% + e)^4 = $2,400,000 / (100% + 8%)^4 = $1,764,071.65

The rate of return can now be calculated as follows:

Rate of return = ((Total Future Value of Income / Present value of cost in year 4)^(1/Number of period)) - 1 = (($3,661,508.81 / $1,764,071.65)^(1/10)) - 1 = 0.0758, or 7.58%

2. Use the PW method and a MARR of 18% to determine whether this is a good investment.

Note: See Part 2 of the attached excel file for the calculation of net present value (NPV).

From part 2 of the attached excel file, we have:

Net present value = –$21,043.15

Since the net present value is negative, this implies that this is NOT a good investment.

Download xlsx
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A car owner found that her monthly cost of driving her car depends on the number of miles she drives. She calculates that if she
    5·1 answer
  • The new-product process stage of market testing involves which two of the following? Exposing actual products to prospective con
    9·1 answer
  • after you analyzed demand, you took steps to make sure your business made sense financially. How will thinking on the margin hel
    9·1 answer
  • The objective of a best-cost provider strategy is to:
    15·1 answer
  • Al Razim, a construction engineer, recently traveled to Germany in order to find investors for his real-estate project. While he
    9·1 answer
  • At December 31, DePaul Corporation had the following cumulative temporary differences associated with its operations:_____.
    7·1 answer
  • Suppose the following information was taken from the 2014 financial statements of FedEx Corporation, a major global transportati
    7·2 answers
  • Generally, ______ products require greater modification to meet local market requirements worldwide.
    6·1 answer
  • Two differences between purchasing shares on the stock market and saving in a commercial bank
    6·1 answer
  • What is the area of the triangle below?<br> 4<br> 18
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!