Answer:
The amount of Bad Debt Expense reported in 2019 was $16,100.
Explanation:
Our concern is mainly on the allowance for doubtful accounts. Based on the facts given in the question, the opening balance of the allowance account was $79,900 credit balance, while the closing balance was $96,000 credit. Since there were no write-offs or recoveries during 2019, the bad debt expense is simply the difference between the closing balance and the opening balance i.e, $96,000 - $79,900 = $16,100.
The journal entries will be:
Debit Bad debt expense $16,100
Credit Allowance for doubtful account $16,100
<em>(To record the bad debt expense for 2019) </em>
Answer:
Private Savings + (Imports – Exports) = Investment + (Government Spending – Tax)
Explanation:
This relationship expressed in the equation above is a macro economy equation which is correct and implies that the quantity supplied of financial capital is equal to the quantity demanded of financial capital.
Supply of financial capital is represented by "Private Savings + (Imports – Exports)", while the demand for financial capital is represented by "Investment + (Government Spending – Tax)".
I wish you the best.
Answer:
d. leverage
Explanation:
Leverage -
It is a type of investment strategy , where the borrowed money is used .
It is the method by which the firm or an organisation is expanded by using the borrowed money as the capital and funding , is referred to as leverage .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question,
The person uses borrowed money to increase the potential return of an investment .
Hence , from the question,
The correct term is leverage .
Answer:
<h2>Considering absence of collusion,the firms will choose low price in this instance.</h2>
Explanation:
- First,focusing on all the possible payoffs for the firms under low price situation, the possible individual payoffs for the firms are $8 million and $16 million considering that the other firm chooses low price and high price respectively.
- Now, regarding the individual payoffs from choosing high price, the possible payoffs for the firms are $12 million and $4 million, considering that the other firm chooses high price and low price respectively.
- Therefore, notice that considering all possible scenarios,both the minimum and maximum payoffs from choosing low price are actually higher than the same estimates under choosing higher price.
- Hence, to ensure a higher subsequent individual payoff, both the firms would expectedly choose lower price considering the possibilities of both higher minimum and maximum payoff compared to choosing higher price.
