Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
Answer:
National Bureau of Criminal Identification
Explanation:
Zapoznaj się z zamieszczonymi niżej danymi i określ, czy zdania A–C są prawdziwe.
Źródło: Korzystanie z internetu, Komunikat z badań CBOS, Warszawa, kwiecień 2017.
W Polsce coraz więcej osób korzysta z urządzeń przenośnych służących do łączenia się z internetem.
Na podstawie wykresu można sformułować opinię, że Polacy są społeczeństwem informacyjnym.
Ponad połowa Polaków mogła się łączyć internetem za pomocą urządzeń przenośnych już w 2010 r.
Odszukaj, korzystając z dowolnego medium, informację o tym, ile osób w Polsce posiada telefon komórkowy, laptop, tablet.
Podyskutujcie w klasie o tym, czy potrzebne są zasady etyczne w internecie.
Wyjaśnij, na czym polega zasada zachowania tajemnicy źródła informacji. Dlaczego jest ona ważna?
Answer:
necessary to balance proper exercise of the power
Explanation:
The term "Necessary and Proper Clause" was coined by Associate Justice Louis Brandeis in 1926. It is universally adopted by the courts in United States. It is also known as the "Elastic clause".
Necessary and Proper Clause: Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution
"The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof".
The clause gained prominence after Supreme Court's decision in <em>Lambert v. Yellowley </em>case. The court ruled in favor of restricting medicinal use of alcohol under the 18th Amendment. It was deemed necessary to balance proper exercise of the power.
It is a unique clause in American Constitution as it gives no absolute authority to any law rather it can be amended considering the seriousness of the situation. It makes the Constitution more flexible as well as a method to deal cases with immediate concerns.
The primary potential disadvantage of plea bargain is 'more negative publicity for defendants'.
Option d.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The main drawback of plea bargaining is that innocent persons can indeed be punished. To counter this issue, in 1982, in order to limit the number of plea deals, in California voters decided to initiate amendment 8, so that innocent individuals did not feel obliged to take part in the trial.
An innocent person can accept a plea deal to decrease his or her loss. This means they're going to have a criminal record. Serving time in prison could be requested. Fines or refunds may be payable.
