He will not need to pay a shipping fee because 12*9.75 is more than $100.
280 x (1-0.73)
=280 x 0.37
= £103.60
£280 decreased by 73% is <span>£280 multiplied by 37%.
</span>If this answer has helped you, please make sure to leave a Thank You.
The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>
Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.
Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.
Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106
#SPJ1
Answer:
I think it's A and D
Step-by-step explanation:
For option A, y would be the height or total growth, and x would be time or months and total height = 0.23 feet × 7.5 months
for option D, y would be the total amount of money spent and x would be the number of granola bars bought. total money spent = $0.23 × number of granola bars bought
Options B and C don't work because we don't know the initial values and an initial value would be represented in the equation.
In option E, 0.23 represents the total growth in 7 days, so it would be the total instead of the rate of change
