The argument that a law should not be followed because it violates the inherent rights of human beings follows the natural law theory of jurisprudence.
Natural law is a legal system based on a close observation of human nature and on the values inherent in human nature that can be derived and applied independently of positive law (explicitly enacted laws of the state or society). According to natural law theory, all human beings have inherent rights, which are conferred by "God, nature, or reason" rather than by juridical acts.
Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality." It assumes that you believe that killing others is wrong and that punishment for killing others is right.
Learn more about Natural law here: brainly.com/question/11298929
#SPJ4
The answer is c because it's what's coming in and going out
The answer is <span>Positive punishment
decreases the rate of operant responding, and negative punishment
increases the rate of operant responding.
</span>
<span>An operant response is a
conduct that is modifiable by its results. At the point when conduct is
modified by its results, the likelihood of that conduct happening again may
either increase on account of support or reinforcement or decrease on account
of punishment.</span>
